| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | Hate speech codes typically justify this immunity from criticism by labeling it "provocative speech used to denigrate" members of the group. | | Hate speech codes typically justify this immunity from criticism by labeling it "provocative speech used to denigrate" members of the group. |
| | | | |
| − | These protected groups can include gender, race, ethnicity, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, disability, and sometimes age. | + | These protected groups can include gender, race, ethnicity, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, disability, and sometimes age. |
| − | While language to protect other victim classes has been proposed, the Democratically controlled [[110th Congress]] has rejected protections against the military, pregnant and battered women, or the homeless.
| |
| | | | |
| | Hate speech, even when legally defined as such, is not a crime in the [[United States]] because speech is protected under the [[First Amendment]]. In some instances, however, hate speech may be entered as evidence that a separate crime, such as assault, should qualify as a [[hate crime]]. | | Hate speech, even when legally defined as such, is not a crime in the [[United States]] because speech is protected under the [[First Amendment]]. In some instances, however, hate speech may be entered as evidence that a separate crime, such as assault, should qualify as a [[hate crime]]. |
| | | | |
| − | The primary purposed of hate speech codes and hate crimes legislation in the U.S. and Europe is to end all criticism of homosexuality or homosexual persons by classifying it as "[[Homophobia]]".
| + | Many speech codes cover comments about homosexuals, making it difficult to criticize that lifestyle. |
| | | | |
| | == Use of Term to Censor Religious Speech == | | == Use of Term to Censor Religious Speech == |
| Line 16: |
Line 15: |
| | Similar hate speech laws exist in [[Canada]], in the form of a provision in the [[Canadian Human Rights Act]]. Luckily, attempts to use these provisions to silence religious freedom have been unsuccessful. [[Muslim]] attempts to accuse [[Maclean's]] magazine of hate speech for merely criticizing the religion were rejected.<ref>http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE49993920081010</ref> | | Similar hate speech laws exist in [[Canada]], in the form of a provision in the [[Canadian Human Rights Act]]. Luckily, attempts to use these provisions to silence religious freedom have been unsuccessful. [[Muslim]] attempts to accuse [[Maclean's]] magazine of hate speech for merely criticizing the religion were rejected.<ref>http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE49993920081010</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | The [[gay rights]] movement currently attempts to equate racism and [[anti-Semitism]] with the condemnation of homosexual lifestyle. They claim that, like race, sexual orientation is 100% inherited and immutable but there are studies that question this claim.{{fact}} | + | The [[gay rights]] movement currently attempts to equate racism or [[anti-Semitism]] with the condemnation of homosexual lifestyle. They claim that, like race, sexual orientation is 100% inherited and immutable but there are studies that question this claim.{{fact}} |
| | | | |
| | Nonetheless, the strategy of activists is to insist that condemnation of sin is a type of "prejudice" equivalent to a civil rights violation. They want people of conscience, who already condemn antisemitism and racism, to regard any critique of homosexuality as an expression of "hate". | | Nonetheless, the strategy of activists is to insist that condemnation of sin is a type of "prejudice" equivalent to a civil rights violation. They want people of conscience, who already condemn antisemitism and racism, to regard any critique of homosexuality as an expression of "hate". |