Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta
289
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + + + +
Debate:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability? (view source)
Revision as of 23:01, February 6, 2007
, 23:01, February 6, 2007→No. Not always:
Wikipedia should not be trusted uncritically. Neither should other encyclopedias. Wikipedia is sometimes ''better'' than other encyclopedias in showing the ''sources'' where it got its information. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:26, 26 January 2007 (EST)
Wikipedia should not be trusted uncritically. Neither should other encyclopedias. Wikipedia is sometimes ''better'' than other encyclopedias in showing the ''sources'' where it got its information. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 17:26, 26 January 2007 (EST)
I just checked wikipedia and it actually uses A.D. B.C., try looking up Mesopotamia or Rome, maybe others. I'm not trying to be aginst Conservapedia, I'm just being objective.
Double Edge