Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,092
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + + + +
→Category usage: new section
Also, I see that in many of your articles you still do not cite any sources. I encourage you to add at least one good source for an article, even if it is a very short article, as it improves the quality of the article and our reputation. Regardless, thank you for your edits. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:09, 19 January 2017 (EST)
Also, I see that in many of your articles you still do not cite any sources. I encourage you to add at least one good source for an article, even if it is a very short article, as it improves the quality of the article and our reputation. Regardless, thank you for your edits. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:09, 19 January 2017 (EST)
== Category usage ==
I see you are making great progress in creating and structuring categories to go with pages! Keep it up! Just one note, in general it's best to to avoid including but parent and child categories. In the category "tree" please try to only include an article on one "level". If it applies to two entirely different branches, then it's okay to include it regardless, but in cases such as [[Tagus]], try to include it in only the category "European Rivers" or only in the categories of the specific countries it runs through, such as "Portuguese Rivers". Thanks for your work! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 13:13, 20 January 2017 (EST)