343
edits
Changes
→as a point of information: a question to Conservative about what he said
Editors might wish to compare our article here to another wiki's article. Why do I say this? I say this because most of this article does not contain the information that constitutes scientology. It contains plenty of criticism but it does not really tell you what the subject is about. Here is another wiki's treatment of the [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Scientology#_ref-2 same subject]. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 21:09, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Editors might wish to compare our article here to another wiki's article. Why do I say this? I say this because most of this article does not contain the information that constitutes scientology. It contains plenty of criticism but it does not really tell you what the subject is about. Here is another wiki's treatment of the [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Scientology#_ref-2 same subject]. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 21:09, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::We heard the same about the [[Theory of evolution]] article. Let the readers decide if Scientology deserves ample criticism from the sources cited. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::We heard the same about the [[Theory of evolution]] article. Let the readers decide if Scientology deserves ample criticism from the sources cited. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: I was of the impression that our motivations were not reader's estimations of how much criticsm an article should contain. Is that in the commandments somewhere? I would like to follow your reasoning. Do you mean by observing the page hits of the [[Scientology]] article? I don't understand what you mean by "let the readers decide if Scientology deserves criticism". I don't understand how even a page counter would tell us what a reader's attitude is. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 22:05, 26 April 2007 (EDT)