Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + +
→Repairs, Upgrades, Improvements, Corrections, History: *LOL*
I just now looked here at what others had to say, and I believe all the comments here are relevant to the condition of the article as I first found it. Objections are fairly representative of a spectrum of opinions and informed objections and protests. I hope this current revision passes muster as a balanced, informed treatment of the topic. Will check back for review of the new material. God bless you all. ''Pax vobis. Semper Fi!'' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 02:22, 23 January 2017 (EST)
I just now looked here at what others had to say, and I believe all the comments here are relevant to the condition of the article as I first found it. Objections are fairly representative of a spectrum of opinions and informed objections and protests. I hope this current revision passes muster as a balanced, informed treatment of the topic. Will check back for review of the new material. God bless you all. ''Pax vobis. Semper Fi!'' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 02:22, 23 January 2017 (EST)
:''"I hope this current revision passes muster as a balanced, informed treatment of the topic"'' You must be kidding: It is hard to imagine a Catholic who would not feel insulted by this article, which attacks the position of the pope in the very first section "''"Father" Matthew 23:9 exegesis''"!
:The introduction should be about the pope in Rome, and not include small schismatic churches like Palmyra - like done in[[Pope#The Supreme Pontiff]], which belongs to the very beginning of the article! You make valid points in your Biblical criticism of the pope, but these belong on the very end of the article - or even in a separate essay! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:59, 23 January 2017 (EST)