Changes

== Unsigned Comments Will Be Deleted! ==

== Miscellaneous comments 2007-2008==

 

 

 

I Believe the inclusion of Angel Raisch, drug abuser, on this list of Schiavo-like individuals, is extremely inappropriate. Terri was a bulimic, and possibly the victim of domestic abuse, not a law-flouting hippie pursuing selfish ends. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:42, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

I Believe the inclusion of Angel Raisch, drug abuser, on this list of Schiavo-like individuals, is extremely inappropriate. Terri was a bulimic, and possibly the victim of domestic abuse, not a law-flouting hippie pursuing selfish ends. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:42, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

::Spoon, discuss on talk first before including.  Raich's 'starvation' strains credulity given the well-known affects of marijuana intake upon appetite. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

::Spoon, discuss on talk first before including.  Raich's 'starvation' strains credulity given the well-known affects of marijuana intake upon appetite. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

:::I insist that Raich, as she is not in a vegetative state, is not in any way comparable to Terri.  Angel Raich can eat, if she choses to.  She simply prefers to revel in her sinfulness and fails to take responsibility for her food intake in a responsible, law-abiding, fashion. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

:::I insist that Raich, as she is not in a vegetative state, is not in any way comparable to Terri.  Angel Raich can eat, if she choses to.  She simply prefers to revel in her sinfulness and fails to take responsibility for her food intake in a responsible, law-abiding, fashion. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 15:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Did anyone notice that the sources listed DIRECTLY contradict the opinions expressed in the article?  Whomever is the author of the article should either find new sources or take out any subjective comments.  Otherwise you render the viewpoints within as false.  {{unsigned|DrCody}}

Did anyone notice that the sources listed DIRECTLY contradict the opinions expressed in the article?  Whomever is the author of the article should either find new sources or take out any subjective comments.  Otherwise you render the viewpoints within as false.  {{unsigned|DrCody}}

:::"Brain damage 'was irreversible . . . no amount of treatment or rehabilitation would have reversed' it." It's right there in the article. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:31, 30 January 2008 (EST)

:::"Brain damage 'was irreversible . . . no amount of treatment or rehabilitation would have reversed' it." It's right there in the article. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:31, 30 January 2008 (EST)