Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, rollback
19,320
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 407:
Line 407: + + + +
Talk:Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 03:24, January 25, 2017
, 03:24, January 25, 2017→Why I removed some stuff: reverting half of that
"The lamestream media finally admits what Conservapedia has known for a decade: Fidel Castro is dead. Maybe in another few years they'll acknowledge the Affirmative Action President!" - But they did not prove Castro has been dead for 10 years, only that he is dead by now.
"The lamestream media finally admits what Conservapedia has known for a decade: Fidel Castro is dead. Maybe in another few years they'll acknowledge the Affirmative Action President!" - But they did not prove Castro has been dead for 10 years, only that he is dead by now.
[[User:JGurba|JGurba]] ([[User talk:JGurba|talk]]) 16:57, 18 January 2017 (EDT)
[[User:JGurba|JGurba]] ([[User talk:JGurba|talk]]) 16:57, 18 January 2017 (EDT)
:In my opinion, you do have a point on the first and third edits. The first may have a valid point, but significant assumption is required to claim that there is proof. The third is in the same league as those who say that playing with toy guns will make you a murder. Shooting fake guns does not a murderer make. I will grant that many video games are excessively violent (and I prefer not to play them). However, the conscience is a powerful force, and is not seared by video games. Murder will still be strongly protested by the conscience, unless it has been seared by other actions and thoughts. I see this argument from time to time from some very good, Godly people, but I don't see how they can make such a direct correlation. If killing in a video game make one a murderer, what about all those who kill in the line of duty? Do they instantly become murderers as well? Despite what Hollywood tells us, many of them become or continue being "gentile giants." The mindset it what counts most.
:On number two, I think the point is that they continue ignoring the problem of useless college majors. They accept their generous pay, and leave the students to suffer after graduating, when they find out all they can do is teach (which is a difficult field to enter). On the fourth one, you're right that they didn't come out and say it had happened ten years ago, but this is the first time they've even admitted he is dead. They have been ridiculing anyone who says he died in that hospital, but now they admit he died. They won't admit the extent of their deception (yet), but I say this one still stands.
:I'm willing to debate it further when I have the time, but I think it's a bit hasty to throw all of this out. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 22:24, 24 January 2017 (EST)