1,106
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 320:
Line 320: +
no edit summary
:::: I was of the impression that our motivations were not reader's estimations of how much criticsm an article should contain. Is that in the commandments somewhere? I would like to follow your reasoning. Do you mean by observing the page hits of the [[Scientology]] article? I don't understand what you mean by "let the readers decide if Scientology deserves criticism". I don't understand how even a page counter would tell us what a reader's attitude is. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 22:05, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: I was of the impression that our motivations were not reader's estimations of how much criticsm an article should contain. Is that in the commandments somewhere? I would like to follow your reasoning. Do you mean by observing the page hits of the [[Scientology]] article? I don't understand what you mean by "let the readers decide if Scientology deserves criticism". I don't understand how even a page counter would tell us what a reader's attitude is. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 22:05, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::I don't think a page with only you as the sole author is the model to work from since you seem to be the odd person out here. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 22:34, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
== The opinion I removed ==
== The opinion I removed ==