Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 331: Line 331:     
::Secular dating?  What's that?  Is there religous dating of artifacts/fossils?  Please explain.  [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 12:18, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::Secular dating?  What's that?  Is there religous dating of artifacts/fossils?  Please explain.  [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 12:18, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
−
 
+
:::Uniformitarian dating.  Dating that ''a priori'' excludes Biblical history and its potential affects on the results from consideration.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
    
I'm sure they did try that on at least one dinosaur, besides, they used it on 10.000 years old human settlements.
 
I'm sure they did try that on at least one dinosaur, besides, they used it on 10.000 years old human settlements.
Line 339: Line 339:     
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]
 
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]
 +
:(sigh).  You haven't answered my question above.  You've simply repeated your own blinkered point of view.  You're simply saying, "you can't be right because I'm right".  That's not an argument; that's an assertion of a closed mind. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu