Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
330 bytes added ,  13:36, January 29, 2017
→‎External links: link https://www.probe.org/the-council-of-nicea/ detailed responses to objections to Trinity
Line 91: Line 91:     
[https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/is-god-a-trinity/the-surprising-origins-of-the-trinity-doctrine The Surprising Origins of the Trinity Doctrine, by United Church of Christ (2011)] ''supports rejection of the Trinitarian doctrine as being firmly rooted in paganism—"the true Church was largely absent from the scene, having been driven underground"'' (the true Church is then identified with [[Heresy|heretics]], and the orthodox leaders are identified as false teachers of corrupted doctrines.)
 
[https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/is-god-a-trinity/the-surprising-origins-of-the-trinity-doctrine The Surprising Origins of the Trinity Doctrine, by United Church of Christ (2011)] ''supports rejection of the Trinitarian doctrine as being firmly rooted in paganism—"the true Church was largely absent from the scene, having been driven underground"'' (the true Church is then identified with [[Heresy|heretics]], and the orthodox leaders are identified as false teachers of corrupted doctrines.)
 +
 +
[https://www.probe.org/the-council-of-nicea/ The Council of Nicea and the Doctrine of the Trinity, Written by Don Closson (probe.org)] ''answers by a [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] and historian to all the points of objection raised against Trinitarian doctrine'' (a perfect counterpoint to the UCC article above)
    
;Unitarian
 
;Unitarian
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu