Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
542 bytes added ,  05:05, February 7, 2017
Line 1,057: Line 1,057:  
It seems the bot pulled that link because technically, we're not supposed to include see also links to category pages.  I don't much care, but the manual of style says that someplace. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 23:42, 6 February 2017 (EST)
 
It seems the bot pulled that link because technically, we're not supposed to include see also links to category pages.  I don't much care, but the manual of style says that someplace. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 23:42, 6 February 2017 (EST)
 
:If we are not allowed to use them, then I don't mind removing it (even though I don't really mind at all either). I just wanted to restore any questionable bot changes (even though this one is not questionable after all). --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:51, 6 February 2017 (EST)
 
:If we are not allowed to use them, then I don't mind removing it (even though I don't really mind at all either). I just wanted to restore any questionable bot changes (even though this one is not questionable after all). --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:51, 6 February 2017 (EST)
 +
::I appreciate you keeping a critical eye on it--something can always go wrong.  I can't quickly pick out that rule/guideline in the manual. It is mentioned [[Conservapedia:How_to_create_and_maintain_high-quality_articles#Categories|here]] though.  I don't want to be going around bashing the rules over peoples' heads.  I just wanted to find out why it did that, and once I did, wanted to let you know.  Cheers! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 00:05, 7 February 2017 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
19,868

edits

Navigation menu