Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,621
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: − == Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science == − − ''See also:'' [[Atheism and scientism]] and [[Scientism]] − − [[Image:Billcraig_czvx.jpg|left|thumb|135px|[[William Lane Craig]] ]] − − Scientism is the belief that the [[scientific method]] has no (or few) limits and can successfully be applied to almost all aspects of life, and provides an explanation for everything. It is essentially a [[religion]] where its followers (Scientists) worship [[science]] its rituals, and its results.<ref>Ashgate Science and Religion Series</ref> − − A large segment of the [[Atheist Population|atheist population]], especially [[New Atheism|new atheists]], hold to ideology of [[scientism]] and/or they are science fetishists.<ref> − *[https://carm.org/an-examination-of-atheisms-truth-claims An Examination of Atheism’s Truth Claims] by Robin Schumacher − *[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2010/09/scientific-hypocrisy.html Scientific hypocrisy]</ref> − − In addition, many atheists have an inordinate degree of confidence in the consensus opinions of scientists instead of possessing a healthy degree of skepticism.<ref>[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/12/no-skepticism-in-science.html No skepticism in science]</ref> − − Strict scientism as a worldview is self-refuting since the scientism cannot be proven to be true through science.<ref>[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/is-scientism-self-refuting Is scientism self-refuting] by William Lane Craig</ref> For other significant problems with scientism as far as its unworkability, please see [[William Lane Craig]]'s commentary on scientism entitled [http://www.reasonablefaith.org/is-scientism-self-refuting Is scientism self-refuting?]. − − === Atheists, scientism and the limitations of science === − − ''See also:'' [[Limitations of science]] − − Atheists who hold to scientism and/or are science fetishists, often fail to have an appreciation for the [[limitations of science]].<ref>[http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/wheres-the-conflict/17724 Where’s the conflict?] by Alister McGrath</ref> −
Atheism and naturalistic intelligence (view source)
Revision as of 17:53, February 10, 2017
, 17:53, February 10, 2017→Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today] by Jerry Bergman</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Moral failures of the atheist population]]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today] by Jerry Bergman</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Moral failures of the atheist population]]
== Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science ==
== Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science ==