Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
28 bytes added ,  07:18, April 27, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
Federalism is the system of co-sovereigns in the United States, as well as in other countries, with a national or federal government having power along with state governments over the same territory and citizenry.   
+
'''Federalism''' is the system of co-sovereigns in the United States, as well as in other countries, with a national or federal government having power along with state governments over the same territory and citizenry.   
    
When the national government was young, federalism stood for a stronger federal government.  After the federal government became very strong, however, federalism has stood for keeping the federal government out of matters traditionally within the domain of state government, such as education, family law, medical care, and law enforcement.
 
When the national government was young, federalism stood for a stronger federal government.  After the federal government became very strong, however, federalism has stood for keeping the federal government out of matters traditionally within the domain of state government, such as education, family law, medical care, and law enforcement.
Line 6: Line 6:     
Since that ruling there have been many decisions by the Supreme Court and lower courts limiting federal power to interfere with state sovereignty in fields of traditional state control.  For example, The Fifth Circuit held that "[w]here Congress aims to change the usual constitutional balance between the states and the federal government, it must make unmistakably clear its intention to do so in the statute’s language."  ''Premiere Network Servs. v. SBC Comm.'', 440 F.3d 683, 690 n.8 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing ''Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police'', 491 U.S. 58, 65 (1989) and ''Gonzales v. Oregon'', 546 U.S. 243 (2006), emphasis added).
 
Since that ruling there have been many decisions by the Supreme Court and lower courts limiting federal power to interfere with state sovereignty in fields of traditional state control.  For example, The Fifth Circuit held that "[w]here Congress aims to change the usual constitutional balance between the states and the federal government, it must make unmistakably clear its intention to do so in the statute’s language."  ''Premiere Network Servs. v. SBC Comm.'', 440 F.3d 683, 690 n.8 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing ''Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police'', 491 U.S. 58, 65 (1989) and ''Gonzales v. Oregon'', 546 U.S. 243 (2006), emphasis added).
 +
[[category:politics]]
6,068

edits

Navigation menu