SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,401
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Updated information on the neo-Nazi wing
Relationally, neo-nazism is a component of the alt-right (big-tent movement); the alt-right is NOT a component of neo-nazism. The alt-right heavily employs principles from Italian fascism which is the racially-agnostic predecessor of Nazism (German fascism).
Relationally, neo-nazism is a component of the alt-right (big-tent movement); the alt-right is NOT a component of neo-nazism. The alt-right heavily employs principles from Italian fascism which is the racially-agnostic predecessor of Nazism (German fascism).
Currently, there are growing tensions between the mainstream alt-right and the neo-Nazi wing. In September 2015, mainstream Alex Jones and neo-Nazi David Duke have also exchanged barbs, the former calling the latter a "Democratic plant" and the latter referring to his news organization, ''Infowars', as being "infiltrated" by Zionists.'In November 2016, a feud broke out between neo-Nazi Richard B. Spencer (who, as previously stated, was one of the coiners of the term "alt-right") and Mike Cernovich, one of the most prominent alt-right meme-makers, after Cernovich publicly condemned Spencer and accused him of being controlled opposition for including the use of Nazi salutes at a pro-Trump victory party he held. Meanwhile, Paul Joseph Watson was harassed on Twitter by neo-Nazis after he posted a tweet that claimed that there were ''two'' alt-rights (the mainstream and the neo-Nazis), and that the neo-Nazi alt-right were "right-wing SJWs." [http://davidduke.com/dr-david-duke-official-statement-on-the-duke-jones-great-debate/][http://heatst.com/culture-wars/the-alt-right-movement-is-in-disarray-founder-claims-its-civil-war/] In December 2016, Mike Cernovich again got into a clash with the neo-Nazi wing after he banned neo-Nazi Tim Treadstone from attending a pro-Trump victory party after Treadstone posted multiple anti-Semitic tweets on Twitter.[http://www.businessinsider.com/alt-right-civil-war-twitter-cernovich-milo-alaska-2016-12] Currently, the two neo-Nazi alt-right wikis, Metapedia and Rightpedia (the latter which was created by neo-Nazis that think Metapedia isn't racist enough) portray Conservapedia in an extremely negative light. Just to be clear how deranged those websites are, at least one of them, and in many cases both of them, do the following:
* Reject conservatism because it doesn't put race as a central tenet of its ideology
* Proclaim bigotry against evangelicals for their pro-Israel stance
* Reject creationism
* Accuse Conservapedia of being politically correct because it's not blatantly racist
* Reject capitalism as being too materialistic
* Pretend to be anti-Islam but in fact support it when it comes to Israel's enemies Hamas and Hezbollah
* Accuse Freemasonry of being a Jewish plot
* Promote Holocaust denial and a positive view of Adolf Hitler
* Attack Conservapedia for using the Bible, and not Social Darwinism, as the basis for its support for social conservatism
* Promotes eugenics
* Accuse Conservapedia of being a partisan hack website, completely ignoring the constant references to "RINOs" on that site
* Accuse Conservapedia of being pro-Communist for even ''using'' the word "racist" and "Nazi"
* Attack the Bible for suggesting that all humans of all colors are descendants of Noah, and falsely claims that Noah was only the father of the white man[http://en.rightpedia.info/w/Conservapedia][http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia]
In light of such ideological differences, it is important to debate how often the term "alt-right" should be used by those who claim to follow the mainstream version of it. On one hand, the term is an accurate description (the mainstream "alt-right" are an ''alternative'' to RINOs). But on the other hand, since the term is most commonly attributed to neo-Nazi Richard B. Spencer, it might not be smart to proclaim to belong to a term associated with him unless you actually agree with his core positions, and doing so could be considered as ideologically dishonest as the left's hijacking of the term "liberal."
==Libertarian Nationalism==
==Libertarian Nationalism==