Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,904 bytes added ,  21:52, February 15, 2017
Line 468: Line 468:     
::Trump is not a fiscal conservative though and there will be economic consequences. You cannot ignore basic rules of economics and not pay consequences. You cannot get away with spending more than you intake and get away with it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, 15 February 2017 (EST)
 
::Trump is not a fiscal conservative though and there will be economic consequences. You cannot ignore basic rules of economics and not pay consequences. You cannot get away with spending more than you intake and get away with it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, 15 February 2017 (EST)
 +
 +
:::The Cold War was not an active war like the kind we see being completed now.  Since 1977, the largest percentage of the GDP spent on defense was 6% from 1983 to 1988.  Now it's at 2.8%-3.1%, the smallest since Fiscal Year 2001, ending September 30, 2001.  If we're seeing a "cold war light", we should keep in mind the Cold War was pretty light to begin with!  Trump also pledged to take the money out of NATO's hide if the alliance doesn't become more financially accountable.
 +
 +
:::Trump promised repeal and replace of ObamaCare, a program designed to cause government-controlled healthcare with all its attendant waste, abuse and non-market-pressured bureaucracy by using the finance of costly liberal mandates as stepping stones to bankrupt the medical insurance business.  It would have been a personal vindication for Hillary if she were the one completing the designs of her HillaryCare project with similar aims she started in the 1990s.  The Democrats tried to restructure a large sector of the economy to solve the alleged problem of the medically uninsured, which would have only cost about $60 billion (according to Rush Limbaugh) to give them free insurance without having to change anything.
 +
 +
:::Trump also promised to make deals with the pharmaceutical industry to get volume discounts where the government pays for their drugs.
 +
 +
:::I didn't want to jinx the election, but I guess now I can say that Obama destabilized the perceived risk of investment from making everyone wonder what strange liberal policy he would enact next, so there's a good chance we'll see GDP growth that will help reduce the debt.
 +
 +
:::If we get a wall, we'll also see fewer immigration-related expenses to feed, clothe, school, pay for medicine, jail or give Social Security to these immigrants and their families. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 16:52, 15 February 2017 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,716

edits

Navigation menu