Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (view source)
Revision as of 20:41, March 3, 2017
, 20:41, March 3, 2017→top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup, typos fixed: Subsequently → Subsequently,
In '''''Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics''''', 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended [[Section 1983]] type of liability to agents of the federal government for a [[Fourth Amendment]] violation by [[federal]] officers. The victim is entitled to recover his damages.
In '''''Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics''''', 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended [[Section 1983]] type of liability to agents of the federal government for a [[Fourth Amendment]] violation by [[federal]] officers. The victim is entitled to recover his damages.
Subsequently the Court has recognized two more non-statutory damages remedies:
Subsequently, the Court has recognized two more non-statutory damages remedies:
*for employment discrimination in violation of the Due Process Clause, ''Davis v. Passman'', 442 U.S. 228 (1979)
*for employment discrimination in violation of the Due Process Clause, ''Davis v. Passman'', 442 U.S. 228 (1979)