Changes

Classical apologetics (also known as traditional apologetics) has as its distinctive feature a two-step approach to establishing a Christian worldview. Classical apologists are often hesitant to make an argument directly from miracles to the biblical God. Rather, they prefer to appeal to miracles after having already established a theistic context. Modern proponents of classical apologetics include R.C. Sproul, William Lane Craig, and Norman Geisler.  

Classical apologetics (also known as traditional apologetics) has as its distinctive feature a two-step approach to establishing a Christian worldview. Classical apologists are often hesitant to make an argument directly from miracles to the biblical God. Rather, they prefer to appeal to miracles after having already established a theistic context. Modern proponents of classical apologetics include R.C. Sproul, William Lane Craig, and Norman Geisler.  

Christian philosopher Norman Geisler summarized the difference between classical and evidential apologetics in this way: "The difference between the classical apologists and the evidentialists on the use of historical evidences is that the classical see the need to first establish that this is a theistic universe...The basic argument of the classical apologist is that it makes no sense to speak about the resurrection as an act of God unless, as a logical prerequisite, it is first established that there is a God who can act" (Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics).<ref>[https://www.gotquestions.org/classical-apologetics.html What is classical apologetics?]</ref>}}

Christian philosopher [[Norman Geisler]] summarized the difference between classical and evidential apologetics in this way: "The difference between the classical apologists and the evidentialists on the use of historical evidences is that the classical see the need to first establish that this is a theistic universe...The basic argument of the classical apologist is that it makes no sense to speak about the resurrection as an act of God unless, as a logical prerequisite, it is first established that there is a God who can act" (Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics).<ref>[https://www.gotquestions.org/classical-apologetics.html What is classical apologetics?]</ref>}}

Matt Slick of [[Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry]] (CARM) declares:

Matt Slick of [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]] (CARM) declares:

{{Cquote|Classical Apologetics is that style of Christian defense that stresses rational arguments for the existence of God and uses evidence to substantiate biblical claims and miracles.  It is quite similar to [[evidential apologetics]] and appeals to human reason and evidence.  Early Classical Apologists include [[Augustine]], [[Anselm]], and [[Thomas Aquinas]].  Contemporary classical apologists are [[Norman Geisler]], [[William Lane Craig|William Craig]], J. P. Moreland, and [[R.C. Sproul]].

{{Cquote|Classical Apologetics is that style of Christian defense that stresses rational arguments for the existence of God and uses evidence to substantiate biblical claims and miracles.  It is quite similar to [[evidential apologetics]] and appeals to human reason and evidence.  Early Classical Apologists include [[Augustine]], [[Anselm]], and [[Thomas Aquinas]].  Contemporary classical apologists are Norman Geisler, [[William Lane Craig|William Craig]], J. P. Moreland, and [[R.C. Sproul]].

Some of the arguments relied upon for proofs of God's existence are the [[cosmological argument]] and the [[teleological argument]].  The cosmological argument attempts to prove that God exists by stating that there has to be an uncaused cause of all things.  That uncaused cause is God.  The teleological argument uses the analogy of design; that is, the universe and life exhibit marks of design.  Therefore, there must be a Designer.  Other times, strict evidence is used to establish Christianity's validity.  Of course, both aspects are also combined in classical apologetics.<ref>[https://carm.org/classical-apologetics Classical Apologetics] by Matt Slick</ref>}}

Some of the arguments relied upon for proofs of God's existence are the [[cosmological argument]] and the [[teleological argument]].  The cosmological argument attempts to prove that God exists by stating that there has to be an uncaused cause of all things.  That uncaused cause is God.  The teleological argument uses the analogy of design; that is, the universe and life exhibit marks of design.  Therefore, there must be a Designer.  Other times, strict evidence is used to establish Christianity's validity.  Of course, both aspects are also combined in classical apologetics.<ref>[https://carm.org/classical-apologetics Classical Apologetics] by Matt Slick</ref>}}