Changes

The Christian website Gotquestions.org declares about Classical apolgetics:

The Christian website Gotquestions.org declares about Classical apolgetics:

{{Cquote|Classical apologetics is a method of apologetics that begins by first employing various theistic arguments to establish the existence of God. Classical apologists will often utilize various forms of the cosmological, teleological (Design), ontological, and moral arguments to prove God's existence. Once God's existence has been established, the classical apologist will then move on to present evidence from fulfilled prophecy, the historical reliability of Scripture, and the bodily resurrection of Jesus to distinguish Christianity from all other competing forms of theism.  

{{Cquote|Classical apologetics is a method of apologetics that begins by first employing various theistic arguments to [[Arguments for the existence of God|establish the existence of God]]. Classical apologists will often utilize various forms of the [[Cosmological argument|cosmological]], [[Teleological argument|teleological]] (Design), [[Ontological argument|ontological]], and moral arguments to prove God's existence. Once God's existence has been established, the classical apologist will then move on to present evidence from [[Bible prophecy|fulfilled prophecy]], the historical reliability of Scripture, and the bodily resurrection of Jesus to distinguish Christianity from all other competing forms of theism.  

Classical apologetics (also known as traditional apologetics) has as its distinctive feature a two-step approach to establishing a Christian worldview. Classical apologists are often hesitant to make an argument directly from miracles to the biblical God. Rather, they prefer to appeal to miracles after having already established a theistic context. Modern proponents of classical apologetics include [[R.C. Sproul]], [[William Lane Craig]], and [[Norman Geisler]].  

Classical apologetics (also known as traditional apologetics) has as its distinctive feature a two-step approach to establishing a Christian worldview. Classical apologists are often hesitant to make an argument directly from miracles to the biblical God. Rather, they prefer to appeal to miracles after having already established a theistic context. Modern proponents of classical apologetics include [[R.C. Sproul]], [[William Lane Craig]], and [[Norman Geisler]].  

Matt Slick of [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]] (CARM) declares:

Matt Slick of [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]] (CARM) declares:

{{Cquote|Classical Apologetics is that style of Christian defense that stresses rational arguments for the existence of God and uses evidence to substantiate biblical claims and miracles.  It is quite similar to [[evidential apologetics]] and appeals to human reason and evidence.  Early Classical Apologists include [[Augustine]], [[Anselm]], and [[Thomas Aquinas]].  Contemporary classical apologists are Norman Geisler, [[William Lane Craig|William Craig]], J. P. Moreland, and [[R.C. Sproul]].

{{Cquote|Classical Apologetics is that style of Christian defense that stresses rational arguments for the existence of God and uses evidence to substantiate biblical claims and miracles.  It is quite similar to [[evidential apologetics]] and appeals to human reason and evidence.  Early Classical Apologists include [[Augustine]], [[Anselm]], and [[Thomas Aquinas]].  Contemporary classical apologists are Norman Geisler, William Craig, [[J. P. Moreland|J. P. Moreland]], and R.C. Sproul.

Some of the arguments relied upon for proofs of God's existence are the [[cosmological argument]] and the [[teleological argument]].  The cosmological argument attempts to prove that God exists by stating that there has to be an uncaused cause of all things.  That uncaused cause is God.  The teleological argument uses the analogy of design; that is, the universe and life exhibit marks of design.  Therefore, there must be a Designer.  Other times, strict evidence is used to establish Christianity's validity.  Of course, both aspects are also combined in classical apologetics.<ref>[https://carm.org/classical-apologetics Classical Apologetics] by Matt Slick</ref>}}

Some of the arguments relied upon for proofs of God's existence are the [[cosmological argument]] and the [[teleological argument]].  The cosmological argument attempts to prove that God exists by stating that there has to be an uncaused cause of all things.  That uncaused cause is God.  The teleological argument uses the analogy of design; that is, the universe and life exhibit marks of design.  Therefore, there must be a Designer.  Other times, strict evidence is used to establish Christianity's validity.  Of course, both aspects are also combined in classical apologetics.<ref>[https://carm.org/classical-apologetics Classical Apologetics] by Matt Slick</ref>}}