Changes

The last statement is really nothing more than a paraphrase of Van Til. Moreover, our paper sheds light on how one might understand the term ‘presupposes’ in Van Til’s famous statement. (I don’t claim that this is exactly how Van Til meant it, but I do claim that it’s consonant with his overall apologetic vision.) We have argued that the laws of logic should be understood as divine thoughts — more precisely, as divine thoughts about the essential relations between divine thoughts. Thus the relationship between God and the laws of logic is none other than the relationship between God and God’s thoughts.<ref>[http://www.proginosko.com/2011/12/antitheism-presupposes-theism-and-so-does-every-other-ism/ Antitheism Presupposes Theism (And So Does Every Other ‘Ism’)]</ref>}}

The last statement is really nothing more than a paraphrase of Van Til. Moreover, our paper sheds light on how one might understand the term ‘presupposes’ in Van Til’s famous statement. (I don’t claim that this is exactly how Van Til meant it, but I do claim that it’s consonant with his overall apologetic vision.) We have argued that the laws of logic should be understood as divine thoughts — more precisely, as divine thoughts about the essential relations between divine thoughts. Thus the relationship between God and the laws of logic is none other than the relationship between God and God’s thoughts.<ref>[http://www.proginosko.com/2011/12/antitheism-presupposes-theism-and-so-does-every-other-ism/ Antitheism Presupposes Theism (And So Does Every Other ‘Ism’)]</ref>}}

==  Presuppositional Apologetics and the claim that atheists know God exists ==

==  Presuppositional apologetics and the claim that atheists know God exists ==

''See also:'' [[Denials that atheists exist]] and [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism]] and [[Argument from religious experience]]  

''See also:'' [[Denials that atheists exist]] and [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism]] and [[Argument from religious experience]]