2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 33:
Line 33: − + + +
Essay:Rebuttal to Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 02:50, March 6, 2017
, 02:50, March 6, 2017Added another counterexsample
#:
#:
#:Finally, as noted above, the "c" in the equation is commonly called the "speed of light", but it is really just the calibration factor. The equation is not about light. Just mass and energy. The equation is true in the dark.
#:Finally, as noted above, the "c" in the equation is commonly called the "speed of light", but it is really just the calibration factor. The equation is not about light. Just mass and energy. The equation is true in the dark.
#:
#''How is energy defined?''
#:While the unit of energy in this equation is defined, instead of used, the overall shape of the relationship remains unchanged: Namley, that increasing the mass of the object increases the amount of energy linearly, and increasing the speed of light (if indeed that were possible) causes an exponential increase on e.
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}