Changes

Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)

121 bytes removed , 02:52, March 6, 2017

m

Reverted edits by Cal Um (talk) to last revision by DavidB4-bot

Line 8: Line 8:

*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?

*the formula implies existence of a unified theory of mass and light, when no such theory is possible.

−

*The units used as M are not defined. Therefore, you could also say E=613mc^2, and it would still, technically, be true

''For a rebuttal to these arguments, see [[Essay:Rebuttal to Logical Flaws in E=mc²]].''

Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators

351,789

edits