80
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: − It amuses me that you still haven't been able to come up with a single counter argument, (repeatedly stating your opinion is not a counter argument by the way). You also haven't even achnoledged links I posted to four other pro-geocentric websites! [[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 12:39, 27 April 2007 (EDT)+ +
no edit summary
: The guy is a kook. No one should take the book seriously. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:03, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
: The guy is a kook. No one should take the book seriously. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:03, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
I've made some extensive changes. The article now gives some neutral information on geocentric theory with out promoting it or agreeing with it.
I apologise if my previous posts here have annoyed you, I just want my beliefs to be mentioned and I become somewhat defensive when my beliefs are so casually dismissed and ridiculed, that happens to me rather a lot. I hope you will agree that the article is now neutral and informative. I would welcome any constructive criticism or constructive edits to my work but please don't just delete it again, I have put work into it. Thank you. [[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 13:08, 27 April 2007 (EDT)