Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 102:
Line 102: − +
Liberals do not dare criticize the theory or even discuss its flaws, or else they will never be employed as a teacher or obtain a PhD or college tenure.
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>
|Conservapedia asserts that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 counterexamples. By mid-2016 the number will have grown to 49.<ref>The page [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]] attempts to refute all 49 of them.</ref>
|Conservapedia asserts that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 counterexamples. By mid-2016 the number will have grown to 49.<ref>The page [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]] attempts to refute all 49 of them.</ref>
|Widespread ridicule all across the internet. 98% of Google hits are sarcastic. No one who questions this well-established theory would get employment as a high school science teacher, much less a PhD or college tenure.
|Liberals do not dare criticize the theory or even discuss its flaws, or else they will never be employed as a teacher or obtain a PhD or college tenure.
|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals "defy" the theory.<ref>The article concerns the disconnect between relativity an quantum mechanics at the Planck scale. See #8 in [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], and a rebuttal at #8 to [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]].</ref>
|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals "defy" the theory.<ref>The article concerns the disconnect between relativity an quantum mechanics at the Planck scale. See #8 in [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], and a rebuttal at #8 to [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]].</ref>
|July 12, 2016
|July 12, 2016