Changes

Casey Luskin wrote about the Supreme Court of the United States:  

Casey Luskin wrote about the Supreme Court of the United States:  

{{Cquote|In 2005, the Supreme Court reiterated its view that religion should not be defined narrowly, and the Seventh Circuit likewise observed that “the Court has adopted a broad definition of ‘religion’ that includes non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as theistic ones.” The Seventh Circuit went on to note that “[t]he Supreme Court has recognized atheism as equivalent to a ‘religion’ for purposes of the First Amendment on numerous occasions[.] . . .” Earlier, the Seventh Circuit had observed that “[i]f we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.” Thus, atheism can be a religion for the purpose of constitutional analyses. Now getting courts to enforce this is another matter.<ref>[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/07/for_first_amend1/#sthash.TT9wqQeQ.dpuf Forr First Amendment Purposes, Is Atheism a Religion?] by Casey Luskin</ref>}}

{{Cquote|In 2005, the Supreme Court reiterated its view that religion should not be defined narrowly, and the Seventh Circuit likewise observed that “the Court has adopted a broad definition of ‘religion’ that includes non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as theistic ones.” The Seventh Circuit went on to note that “[t]he Supreme Court has recognized atheism as equivalent to a ‘religion’ for purposes of the [[First Amendment]] on numerous occasions[.] . . .” Earlier, the Seventh Circuit had observed that “[i]f we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.” Thus, atheism can be a religion for the purpose of constitutional analyses. Now getting courts to enforce this is another matter.<ref>[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/07/for_first_amend1/#sthash.TT9wqQeQ.dpuf Forr First Amendment Purposes, Is Atheism a Religion?] by Casey Luskin</ref>}}

John Calvert, a lawyer and [[intelligent design]] proponent declared:

John Calvert, a lawyer and [[intelligent design]] proponent declared: