Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes removed ,  02:46, March 10, 2017
Line 155: Line 155:  
</ref>   
 
</ref>   
   −
If the view that there is no God (or are no gods) is a [[religion]], it is argued its expression is constitutionally protected  in the [[United States]]. <ref>The Supreme Court has said a religion need not be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being. In the 1961 case of [[Torcaso v. Watkins]], the court described "[[secular humanism]]" as a religion. [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874 Court rules atheism is a religion] </ref> The government cannot force [[atheists]] to recant and adopt the opposite belief.  
+
If the view that there is no God (or are no gods) is a religion, it is argued its expression is constitutionally protected  in the [[United States]]. <ref>The Supreme Court has said a religion need not be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being. In the 1961 case of [[Torcaso v. Watkins]], the court described "[[secular humanism]]" as a religion. [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874 Court rules atheism is a religion] </ref> The government cannot force [[atheists]] to recant and adopt the opposite belief.  
    
In his BBC documentary ''The Trouble with Atheism'' the award-winning journalist Rod Liddle indicates:  
 
In his BBC documentary ''The Trouble with Atheism'' the award-winning journalist Rod Liddle indicates:  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,726

edits

Navigation menu