| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | Thus, delivering the twisted message to the public that so called 'sexual orientation' -- used as [[politically correct]] label for [[sexual disorientation]] -- is either genetic or biological, became the main goal of LGBT [[pseudoscience]]. As one of its major protagonist, 'gay' neuroscientist Simon LeVay put it: ''"The question of whether or not gayness is immutable is rather crucial in the [[political]] arena."'' The importance of biological factors behind sodomitical behavior were stressed out also by authors of LGBT '[[Mein Kampf]]' called '[[After the Ball]]': ''"For all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been [[Ideomotor effect|born gay]] – even though [[Sexual disorientation|sexual orientation]], for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence."''<ref name="Mohler2015">{{cite book |title=We Cannot Be Silent: Speaking Truth to a Culture Redefining Sex, Marriage, and the Very Meaning of Right and Wrong |author=R. Albert Mohler, Jr. |publisher=Harper Collins |year=2015 |pages=38 |isbn=978-07180-32487 |url=http://www.albertmohler.com/2015/10/27/we-cannot-be-silent-released-nationwide-today/ |quote=}}</ref> | | Thus, delivering the twisted message to the public that so called 'sexual orientation' -- used as [[politically correct]] label for [[sexual disorientation]] -- is either genetic or biological, became the main goal of LGBT [[pseudoscience]]. As one of its major protagonist, 'gay' neuroscientist Simon LeVay put it: ''"The question of whether or not gayness is immutable is rather crucial in the [[political]] arena."'' The importance of biological factors behind sodomitical behavior were stressed out also by authors of LGBT '[[Mein Kampf]]' called '[[After the Ball]]': ''"For all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been [[Ideomotor effect|born gay]] – even though [[Sexual disorientation|sexual orientation]], for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence."''<ref name="Mohler2015">{{cite book |title=We Cannot Be Silent: Speaking Truth to a Culture Redefining Sex, Marriage, and the Very Meaning of Right and Wrong |author=R. Albert Mohler, Jr. |publisher=Harper Collins |year=2015 |pages=38 |isbn=978-07180-32487 |url=http://www.albertmohler.com/2015/10/27/we-cannot-be-silent-released-nationwide-today/ |quote=}}</ref> |
| | | | |
| | + | ==Ideological thinking== |
| | However, the problem with any area of research that intersects with politics of pressure groups such as the LGBTI one is the motivated rationalizations and reasoning and the [[confirmation bias]]. Where concepts determine percepts, ideology, including the [[gender ideology]], trumps facts and science suffers. Those researchers who know most about genes and [[Same-sex attraction|SSA]] say, ''“Your genes did not make you do it”'', i.e. humans still do have [[free will]] when making their behavioral choices for which they should be held accountable. Everyone has at least a 10% genetic influence in his or her thinking and behaviour — simply because without genes there can be no human activity or behaviour of any kind.<ref>{{cite book |title=My Genes Made Me Do It! Homosexuality and the scientific evidence |author=NE & BK Whitehead |edition=4th (revised) |publisher=Whitehead Associates |year=August 2016 |pages=262-3 |isbn=978-0473174866 |url=http://www.mygenes.co.nz/mgmmdi_pdfs/Summary.pdf }}</ref> | | However, the problem with any area of research that intersects with politics of pressure groups such as the LGBTI one is the motivated rationalizations and reasoning and the [[confirmation bias]]. Where concepts determine percepts, ideology, including the [[gender ideology]], trumps facts and science suffers. Those researchers who know most about genes and [[Same-sex attraction|SSA]] say, ''“Your genes did not make you do it”'', i.e. humans still do have [[free will]] when making their behavioral choices for which they should be held accountable. Everyone has at least a 10% genetic influence in his or her thinking and behaviour — simply because without genes there can be no human activity or behaviour of any kind.<ref>{{cite book |title=My Genes Made Me Do It! Homosexuality and the scientific evidence |author=NE & BK Whitehead |edition=4th (revised) |publisher=Whitehead Associates |year=August 2016 |pages=262-3 |isbn=978-0473174866 |url=http://www.mygenes.co.nz/mgmmdi_pdfs/Summary.pdf }}</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | ==The purpose of sexual orientation theory== |
| | + | ===False message about the equal status=== |
| | + | {| class="infobox bordered" style="font-size:95%; width:25em;" |
| | + | ! style="font-size:120%; background:violet; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" |Two wrongs don’t make a right |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | style="padding:15px;" |''"For example, it is an uncontested fact that homosexual sexual behaviors spread disease. When reminded of this, “gay” sympathizers say, “Heterosexuals do the same things.” This isn’t a logical defense of homosexuality per se, since two wrongs don’t make a right. However, it is an argument for treating homosexuality equally with heterosexuality if the two were truly equivalent.'''But they are not'''."'' |
| | + | <div style="padding-left:40px;">— Scott Lively<ref name="Lively2009"/> |
| | + | </div> |
| | + | |} |
| | + | One purpose of ''sexual orientation theory'' is to create a context in which homosexuality and heterosexuality hold '''equal status'''. The notion of equivalency between homosexuality and heterosexuality is very important to “gay” arguments. For one thing it neutralizes health and safety arguments against the legitimization of homosexuality. |
| | + | Unlike homosexuality, heterosexuality is ''immutable''. To define heterosexuality as merely sexual conduct between people of compatible genders is to suppress a fundamental [[truth]] about what it means to be human. All [[human beings]] with the exception of [[hermaphrodites]] (people with a congenital deformity that causes them to have both male and female genitalia) are born with a [[Reproductive organs|reproductive system]] that is heterosexual by nature. We are either [[male]] or [[female]], what is also reflected in [[Natural order]]. We have sexual feelings only because of chemical and other processes that are rooted in our procreative heterosexual design. Thus, a male 'sexual orientation' toward a female (or vice versa) is self-evidently normal and natural. By contrast, a male-to-male or female-to-female 'orientation' is self-evidently abnormal and unnatural, in fact it is a [[sexual disorientation]]. For homosexuality to be equivalent to heterosexuality, it would need to be rooted in its own homosexual [[physiology]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender disoriented conduct among people who are innately and unalterably heterosexual in form. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees [[moral]]ly) equivalent to [[pedophilia]], [[Sadomasochism|sado-masochism]], [[bestiality]] and many other forms of [[deviant behavior]], or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the [[human being]]<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=Scott Lively |edition=1 |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |pages=101-3 |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow/Redeeming%20the%20Rainbow%20smaller%20file%20for%20e-mail.pdf }}</ref>, as can be shown by [[scientific]] device of [[gedankenexperiment|thought experiment]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Sexual preference determined by birth== | | ==Sexual preference determined by birth== |