Changes

:How does economic theory explain why anyone ever gives anything but money as a gift?

:How does economic theory explain why anyone ever gives anything but money as a gift?

:If someone gives me (say) "The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes: The Complete Short Stories" I might be pleased, but if someone gave me $95 I could ''buy'' ''The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes: The Complete Short Stories,'' in which case I would be just as pleased. Or, I might use the money to buy something different which I liked better. Or, I might know of a place to buy it at a discount, in which case I could have my book and extra money, too.

:If someone gives me (say) ''The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes: The Complete Short Stories'' I might be pleased, but if someone gave me $95 I could ''buy'' ''The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes: The Complete Short Stories,'' in which case I would be just as pleased. Or, I might use the money to buy something different which I liked better. Or, I might know of a place to buy it at a discount, in which case I could have my book and extra money, too.

:If someone gives me money, the ''worst case'' is that I do not know of anything that would please me more than the intended gift. In every other case, I can do better with the money than with the gift.  Therefore, it would seem that the economist's "rational man" would always prefer to give and receive the money. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:51, 8 February 2007 (EST)

:If someone gives me money, the ''worst case'' is that I do not know of anything that would please me more than the intended gift. In every other case, I can do better with the money than with the gift.  Therefore, it would seem that the economist's "rational man" would always prefer to give and receive the money. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:51, 8 February 2007 (EST)