Changes

- [[China]]

- [[China]]

'''What do you think about starting a Conservapedia improvement drive for these articles?'''  Clearly these are serious subjects that people are interested in based on Wikipedia statistics.  I also think that a lot of people gave their lives in regards to these issues (WWI, WWI, Jesus, etc.) and it is important that these subjects be covered.  Therefore, I believe from a priority view of creating important articles and from a strategic point of view in regards to creating internet traffic to Conservapedia, it makes a lot of sense to start a improvement drive in regards to these Conservapedia articles.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:56, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

'''What do you think about starting a Conservapedia improvement drive for these articles?'''  Clearly these are serious subjects that people are interested in based on Wikipedia statistics.  I also think that a lot of people gave their lives in regards to these issues (WWI, WWI, Jesus, etc.) and it is important that these subjects be covered.  Therefore, I believe from a priority view of creating important articles and from a strategic point of view in regards to creating internet traffic to Conservapedia, it makes a lot of sense to start an improvement drive in regards to these Conservapedia articles.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:56, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

: It's a great idea, Conservative!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

: It's a great idea, Conservative!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

If we are going to get http://www.google.com to build our web traffic for us I think the article improvement drive we are engaging in is the answer and I think the article improvement drive should focus on serious subjects that have broad appeal.  With that being said, I don't think it is enough for our specific [[World War I]], [[World War II]], [[Jesus]], and [[Adolf Hitler]] articles to have quality.  They must offer depth of information too.  What do I mean by depth of information?  What I mean is that they must have quality articles associated with them though the internal links, see also sections, and articles available though the [[Category tag]]s.   

If we are going to get http://www.google.com to build our web traffic for us I think the article improvement drive we are engaging in is the answer and I think the article improvement drive should focus on serious subjects that have broad appeal.  With that being said, I don't think it is enough for our specific [[World War I]], [[World War II]], [[Jesus]], and [[Adolf Hitler]] articles to have quality.  They must offer depth of information too.  What do I mean by depth of information?  What I mean is that they must have quality articles associated with them though the internal links, see also sections, and articles available though the [[Category tag]]s.   

I believe there are 5 ways to have lots of articles associated with the above topics (for example, [[World War I]] and [[WWII]]).  The first is to have second, third, and fourth waves of article improvement using the main/front page (for example, have a article improvement drive for "Western front".  The second is to have a article improvement page.  The fourth is to make sure all the articles have [[category tag]]s.  The fifth is to send emails to groups that would be interested in building these articles.

I believe there are 5 ways to have lots of articles associated with the above topics (for example, [[World War I]] and [[WWII]]).  The first is to have second, third, and fourth waves of article improvement using the main/front page (for example, have an article improvement drive for "Western front".  The second is to have an article improvement page.  The fourth is to make sure all the articles have [[category tag]]s.  The fifth is to send emails to groups that would be interested in building these articles.

Here is a email I sent the group whose webpage is  http://www.worldwar1.com/ (World War I - Trenches on the Web):

Here is an email I sent the group whose webpage is  http://www.worldwar1.com/ (World War I - Trenches on the Web):

Dear Mr. Hanlon,  

Dear Mr. Hanlon,