Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,915 bytes removed ,  22:42, March 20, 2017
Line 446: Line 446:  
|Children’s animated film that pushes an environmentalist theme and portrays a Bible-quoting, American type military general as the main antagonist.
 
|Children’s animated film that pushes an environmentalist theme and portrays a Bible-quoting, American type military general as the main antagonist.
 
|$1,647,083
 
|$1,647,083
|-
  −
|''Beauty and the Beast'' (2017 remake)
  −
|2017
  −
|PG
  −
|The 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is the latest in the film trend of needlessly and shamelessly remaking animated films or children's stories for the sake of earning quick revenue in the dying Hollywood studio system. Liberals also seized the opportunity with the remake to exploit diversity within the ''Beauty and the Beast'' universe. The final result of the diversity inclusion is that it feels self-congratulatory in the sense of putting it in for the sake of having it, rather than having it be just a part of the story and the film. One notable example is the filmmakers' decision to make LeFou, Gaston's diminutive and bumbling sidekick, a homosexual who is conflicted with his feelings for Gaston. At the end of film, LeFou is shown taking a romantic interest in a musketeer who is now a transgender woman after being transformed into one during Gaston's siege of the Beast's castle. Not only is it an atrocious artistic decision of the filmmakers to needlessly incorporate diversity simply for the sake of it, but the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' also serves as an example that liberals can legitimately shoehorn the [[homosexual agenda]] into Disney films. Adding salt to the wound, the filmmakers also further changed history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to previous Disney films like ''Mulan'' (1998), ''Pocahontas'' (1995) and ''The Princess and the Frog'' (2009). The 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is now even more of a feminist propaganda film than the 1991 animated film version ever was.
  −
  −
All of that, along with the other shortcomings of the film, reinforces the statement that most of Hollywood is currently out of ideas for motion pictures. It also re-establishes the fact that Disney would, at times, forsake genuine family entertainment in favor of blatant liberal propaganda.
  −
|
   
|-
 
|-
 
|''Beginners''
 
|''Beginners''
SkipCaptcha
106

edits

Navigation menu