Changes

The bioethics chair [[Peter Singer]] once stated that human babies have no more a right to life than pigs and chimpanzees. Owing to this, atheists generally have little problem with either [[eugenics]] or using aborted embryos as fuel for heating hospitals.<ref>[https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/04/ethics-for-atheists/# Would human life be sacred in an atheist world?]</ref> As such, a large part of their beliefs in these actions, and their amorality, is due to their belief in [[determinism]].<ref>[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheism_determinism_morality.html Does Atheism (Determinism) Negatively Impact Morality?]</ref>

The bioethics chair [[Peter Singer]] once stated that human babies have no more a right to life than pigs and chimpanzees. Owing to this, atheists generally have little problem with either [[eugenics]] or using aborted embryos as fuel for heating hospitals.<ref>[https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/04/ethics-for-atheists/# Would human life be sacred in an atheist world?]</ref> As such, a large part of their beliefs in these actions, and their amorality, is due to their belief in [[determinism]].<ref>[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheism_determinism_morality.html Does Atheism (Determinism) Negatively Impact Morality?]</ref>

In addition, atheists compared to [[evangelical Christians|evangelicals]] are statistically more likely to engage in various sins such as viewing pornography, profanity in public, gossiping, drunkenness, with only gambling, sexual intercourse with a non-spouse, retaliation, and lying's statistics being unclear ( See also: [[Atheism and morality studies]])<ref>[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_more_immoral.html Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior - Or Does It?]</ref> In addition, there is research indicating that atheists with social contacts with Christians give more to charity than other atheists.

In addition, atheists compared to [[evangelical Christians|evangelicals]] are statistically more likely to engage in various sins such as viewing pornography, profanity in public, gossiping, drunkenness, with only gambling, sexual intercourse with a non-spouse, retaliation, and lying's statistics being unclear ( See also: [[Atheism and morality studies]])<ref>[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_more_immoral.html Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior - Or Does It?]</ref> In addition, there is research indicating that atheists with social contacts with Christians give more to charity than other atheists. Specifically, [[William Lane Craig]], citing research published by author Arthur C. Brooks, points out that atheists raised in religious households are twice as likely to give to charity than those raised in nonreligious households.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imuaiRO5mSQ&feature=sub Christians Give more to Charity than Atheists] ([[YouTube]] video featuring an audio clip of Dr. [[William Lane Craig]])</ref>

In addition, while atheist claim they have better ethics because it isn't for a reward, there's debate whether being motivated by evolutionary determinism is a good reason to do good.<ref>[https://www.thinkingchristian.net/posts/2016/01/good-nothing-make-atheist-ethics-better-christian/ Being Good “For Nothing” — Does That Make Atheist Ethics Better Than Christian?]</ref> There's also evidence that their ethics rely on "ends justify the means", the opposite of what God decrees as ethics.<ref>[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/questions-on-atheism-ethics-and-marital-conflict Questions on Atheism, Ethics, and Marital Conflict]</ref> [[William Lane Craig]], citing research published by author Arthur C. Brooks, points out that atheists raised in religious households are twice as likely to give to charity than those raised in nonreligious households.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imuaiRO5mSQ&feature=sub Christians Give more to Charity than Atheists] ([[YouTube]] video featuring an audio clip of Dr. [[William Lane Craig]])</ref>

In addition, while atheist claim they have better ethics because it isn't for a reward, there's debate whether being motivated by evolutionary determinism is a good reason to do good.<ref>[https://www.thinkingchristian.net/posts/2016/01/good-nothing-make-atheist-ethics-better-christian/ Being Good “For Nothing” — Does That Make Atheist Ethics Better Than Christian?]</ref> There's also evidence that their ethics rely on "ends justify the means", the opposite of what God decrees as ethics.<ref>[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/questions-on-atheism-ethics-and-marital-conflict Questions on Atheism, Ethics, and Marital Conflict]</ref>  

While atheists make ephismestal arguments for morality, they do not provide an ontological premise for ethics.<ref>[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics]</ref>

While atheists make [[epistomology|epistomological]] arguments for morality, they do not provide an [[ontological]] premise for ethics.<ref>[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics]</ref>

In fact, the closest they have to morality and ethics is via Darwinism and [[utilitarianism]],<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]</ref> and tend to argue that religion is responsible for the evils of the world.<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]</ref> Atheists tend to confuse order of knowing for order of being regarding ethics and morality, and as such, [[Darwinism]] and [[evolution]] are not good substitutes for morality.<ref>[http://www.paulcopan.com/articles/pdf/God-naturalism-morality.pdf God, Naturalism, and the Foundations of Morality]</ref> In addition, while atheists generally agree that [[moral relativism]] is never a good way to determine morality, various attempts at creating objective morality apart from God such as [[Richard Dawkins]]' ''[[The Selfish Gene]]'' as well as Walter-Sinnot Armstrong's position that objective morality simply "is", and Michael Ruse and Edward Wilson's position that it is an evolutionary illusion also proved to have disastrous implications.<ref>[http://www.equip.org/articles/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality/ Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality]</ref> Similarly, the atheists tend to mistake survival rules for morality.<ref>[http://www.doesgodexist.org/NovDec06/AtheisticExplanations.html]</ref>

In fact, the closest they have to morality and ethics is via Darwinism and [[utilitarianism]],<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]</ref> and tend to argue that religion is responsible for the evils of the world.<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]</ref> Atheists tend to confuse order of knowing for order of being regarding ethics and morality, and as such, [[Darwinism]] and [[evolution]] are not good substitutes for morality.<ref>[http://www.paulcopan.com/articles/pdf/God-naturalism-morality.pdf God, Naturalism, and the Foundations of Morality]</ref> In addition, while atheists generally agree that [[moral relativism]] is never a good way to determine morality, various attempts at creating objective morality apart from God such as [[Richard Dawkins]]' ''[[The Selfish Gene]]'' as well as Walter-Sinnot Armstrong's position that objective morality simply "is", and Michael Ruse and Edward Wilson's position that it is an evolutionary illusion also proved to have disastrous implications.<ref>[http://www.equip.org/articles/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality/ Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality]</ref> Similarly, the atheists tend to mistake survival rules for morality.<ref>[http://www.doesgodexist.org/NovDec06/AtheisticExplanations.html]</ref>