Changes

{{Cquote|In the same way, the different finches that Darwin saw on the [[Galapagos Islands]] are another example of variation that is no evidence for "evolution." Recent observations have revealed that the finches did not undergo an unlimited variation as Darwin's theory presupposed. Moreover, most of the different types of finches which Darwin thought represented 14 distinct species actually mated with one another, which means that they were variations that belonged to the same species. Scientific observation shows that the finch beaks, which have been mythicized in almost all evolutionist sources, are in fact an example of "variation"; therefore, they do not constitute evidence for the theory of evolution. For example, Peter and Rosemary Grant, who spent years observing the finch varieties in the Galapagos Islands looking for evidence for Darwinistic evolution, were forced to conclude that "the population, subjected to natural selection, is oscillating back and forth," a fact which implied that no "evolution" that leads to the emergence of new traits ever takes place there.<ref>[http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_species_02.html Darwinism Refuted]</ref>}}

{{Cquote|In the same way, the different finches that Darwin saw on the [[Galapagos Islands]] are another example of variation that is no evidence for "evolution." Recent observations have revealed that the finches did not undergo an unlimited variation as Darwin's theory presupposed. Moreover, most of the different types of finches which Darwin thought represented 14 distinct species actually mated with one another, which means that they were variations that belonged to the same species. Scientific observation shows that the finch beaks, which have been mythicized in almost all evolutionist sources, are in fact an example of "variation"; therefore, they do not constitute evidence for the theory of evolution. For example, Peter and Rosemary Grant, who spent years observing the finch varieties in the Galapagos Islands looking for evidence for Darwinistic evolution, were forced to conclude that "the population, subjected to natural selection, is oscillating back and forth," a fact which implied that no "evolution" that leads to the emergence of new traits ever takes place there.<ref>[http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_species_02.html Darwinism Refuted]</ref>}}

== Biblical creationists on microevolution vs. macroevolution ==

== Dr. Grady McMurtry on microevolution vs. macroevolution ==

In 2011, the [[Creation science|creation scientist]] Dr. [[Grady S. McMurtry]] declared:  

In 2011, the [[Creation science|creation scientist]] Dr. [[Grady S. McMurtry]] declared: