Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,177 bytes added ,  16:54, March 25, 2017
Line 367: Line 367:  
:Thank you, Conservative, for your suggestions. I will begin on some of these soon. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (EDT)
 
:Thank you, Conservative, for your suggestions. I will begin on some of these soon. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (EDT)
 
::I sent you an email. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)
 
::I sent you an email. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Blocking user "reformed" ==
 +
 +
Well, I've got to say that vandalizing the user page of someone with block authority is '''really''' stupid.
 +
 +
But I take issue with your claim that he was an "obvious sock".  As one who has been blocked a number of times on completely bogus socking charges, I take that stuff seriously.  (The blocking was generally done by someone (now deceased) who had "checkuser" privileges and therefore had good tools for detecting socks, but did not understand how internet addresses work.)
 +
 +
It is not at all obvious to me, as one who has a lot of experience at CP, that he was a sock.  He was a vandal, and you should block him for that.
 +
 +
Oh, dear.  Now I see that there's a big storm of this stuff going on.  And, yes, these guys, or at least some of them, are probably socks of each other.  And at least one of them is using the name "obvioussock", just to taunt you.  And one says he used to be a washing machine in his previous life.
 +
 +
My goodness!  I think you are being trolled!  :-)  :-)  And no, I had nothing to do with this.  Just block them.  It will blow over soon.
 +
 +
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:54, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu