1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 160:
Line 160: + +
→Compromise!: Most of the changes do not say what homophobia is
Rob & Roger, I made a compromise edit that I think takes stock of your suggestion, gives my reply, and does it in a good format. Good?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:49, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Rob & Roger, I made a compromise edit that I think takes stock of your suggestion, gives my reply, and does it in a good format. Good?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:49, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:It's taking shape. Perhaps in a third subhead (once these two get a little more information), we can have a sort of a discussion format with rebuttals to the varying views. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:11, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:It's taking shape. Perhaps in a third subhead (once these two get a little more information), we can have a sort of a discussion format with rebuttals to the varying views. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:11, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:: No. Most of the changes do not say what homophobia is, or how the term is used. They only add confusion. I favor reverting. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:44, 27 April 2007 (EDT)