Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Senate rules change (view source)

Revision as of 22:32, April 2, 2017

168 bytes added ,  22:32, April 2, 2017
→‎See also: add another link to analysis
Line 24: Line 24:  
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
*[http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/it-could-be-close-counting-to-51-on-the-nuclear-option/ Daily Caller - "It Could Be Close ...."]
 
*[http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/it-could-be-close-counting-to-51-on-the-nuclear-option/ Daily Caller - "It Could Be Close ...."]
 +
*[http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/republican-support-for-nuclear-option-for-gorsuch-builds-in-senate/article/2618824 Analysis of Republican Senators on rules change]
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:politics]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,622

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1328055"

Navigation menu