Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − − == Silverman's inaccurate reporting on the effectiveness of firebrand atheism == − − ''See also:'' [[Decline of militant atheism in the West]] and [[Atheism and public relations]] − − Silverman still does not recognize that [[New Atheism]] was merely a fad and now a more docile atheism has taken its place (see: [[Decline of militant atheism in the West]]).<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2011/01/19/3116506.htm The poverty of the new atheism] by Scott Stephens</ref><ref>[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2015/12/uproar-against-dawkins-is-sign-of-new-atheism-retrogression/ Uproar Against Dawkins Is Sign of New Atheism Retrogression] by Joshua Kelly</ref><ref>[http://www.firstthings.com/article/2010/05/believe-it-or-not Believe It or Not] by David Bentley Hart</ref>
→Silverman's inaccurate reporting on the effectiveness of firebrand atheism
For more information, please see: [[Elevatorgate]]
For more information, please see: [[Elevatorgate]]
== Silverman intentionally exaggerating the number of atheists in the USA ==
== Silverman intentionally exaggerating the number of atheists in the USA ==