| Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| | * Government mass-surveillance | | * Government mass-surveillance |
| | * Non-syndicalist [[labor union]]s | | * Non-syndicalist [[labor union]]s |
| − | * Racism<ref>http://mrconservative.com/2013/03/9062-25-examples-of-liberal-racism-in-quotes/7/</ref> | + | * [[Racism]]<ref>http://mrconservative.com/2013/03/9062-25-examples-of-liberal-racism-in-quotes/7/</ref> |
| | + | * [[Bigotry]] |
| | + | * [[Anti-Semitism]] |
| | * Advocating incorrect policies <ref>[http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/04/liberals-smug-condescending]</ref> | | * Advocating incorrect policies <ref>[http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/04/liberals-smug-condescending]</ref> |
| | * Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007</ref> | | * Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007</ref> |
| Line 82: |
Line 84: |
| | * Support of financially irresponsible policies | | * Support of financially irresponsible policies |
| | * [[Slavery]]<ref>http://russp.us/racism.htm</ref> | | * [[Slavery]]<ref>http://russp.us/racism.htm</ref> |
| − | * Encouragement of [[Global Warming|global warming alarmism]] | + | * Encouragement of [[Global Warming|"global warming" alarmism]] |
| | * Rejection of logical<ref>[http://www.pjstar.com/article/20140711/OPINION/140719804/2011/OPINION Liberals are illogical, and good at it]</ref> standards | | * Rejection of logical<ref>[http://www.pjstar.com/article/20140711/OPINION/140719804/2011/OPINION Liberals are illogical, and good at it]</ref> standards |
| | Liberals currently use two Clauses of the Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions "promoting the general welfare". This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money. The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of FDR this Clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as [[Obamacare]]. In the ACA, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states. | | Liberals currently use two Clauses of the Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions "promoting the general welfare". This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money. The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of FDR this Clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as [[Obamacare]]. In the ACA, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states. |
| Line 91: |
Line 93: |
| | | | |
| | ==Liberals and uncharitableness== | | ==Liberals and uncharitableness== |
| − |
| |
| | ''See also'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]] | | ''See also'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]] |
| | [[File:Beggar.jpg|thumb|right|240px|[[United States|American]] liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives.<ref name=georgeWill>[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html Conservatives More Liberal Givers], [[RealClearPolitics]]</ref> ]] | | [[File:Beggar.jpg|thumb|right|240px|[[United States|American]] liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives.<ref name=georgeWill>[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html Conservatives More Liberal Givers], [[RealClearPolitics]]</ref> ]] |
| Line 124: |
Line 125: |
| | | | |
| | == Secular left == | | == Secular left == |
| − |
| |
| | ''See also:'' [[Secular left]] | | ''See also:'' [[Secular left]] |
| | | | |
| Line 130: |
Line 130: |
| | | | |
| | === Decline of the secular left === | | === Decline of the secular left === |
| − |
| |
| | ''See also:'' [[Decline of the secular left]] | | ''See also:'' [[Decline of the secular left]] |
| | | | |
| Line 136: |
Line 135: |
| | | | |
| | == Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity == | | == Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity == |
| − |
| |
| | ''See also:'' [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]] and [[Liberal Christianity]] | | ''See also:'' [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]] and [[Liberal Christianity]] |
| | | | |
| Line 153: |
Line 151: |
| | | | |
| | ===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members=== | | ===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members=== |
| − |
| |
| | The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings<ref>[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm How the House voted]</ref> of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy. | | The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings<ref>[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm How the House voted]</ref> of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy. |
| | | | |
| | === American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism === | | === American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism === |
| − | '' | + | ''See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]] |
| − | See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]] | |
| | | | |
| | Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise. | | Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise. |
| Line 166: |
Line 162: |
| | | | |
| | ==Liberalism in Europe today== | | ==Liberalism in Europe today== |
| − |
| |
| | In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe<ref>[http://www.alde.eu Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the European Parliament]</ref> is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,<ref>[http://www.liberal-international.org/ World Federation of Liberalism]</ref> such as the Liberal Party of Australia.<ref>[http://www.liberal.org.au/ Liberal Party of Australia]</ref> | | In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe<ref>[http://www.alde.eu Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the European Parliament]</ref> is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,<ref>[http://www.liberal-international.org/ World Federation of Liberalism]</ref> such as the Liberal Party of Australia.<ref>[http://www.liberal.org.au/ Liberal Party of Australia]</ref> |
| | | | |
| Line 180: |
Line 175: |
| | | | |
| | == Notable liberal "intellects" == | | == Notable liberal "intellects" == |
| − |
| |
| | ''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]] | | ''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]] |
| | | | |
| Line 225: |
Line 219: |
| | * [[Joseph Stalin]] | | * [[Joseph Stalin]] |
| | | | |
| − | *[[Bill Nye]] | + | * [[Bill Nye]] |
| | | | |
| | * [[Attila the Hun]] | | * [[Attila the Hun]] |
| Line 335: |
Line 329: |
| | | | |
| | == Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation == | | == Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation == |
| − |
| |
| | ''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]] | | ''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]] |
| | | | |