Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,091
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: + + Line 41:
Line 43: +
→Too much emphasis on Trump
:::Mainstream media has for a solid 18 months reported the DNC [[talking point]] that Trump is anti-Black. While Trump has made statements and held policy positions some may misinterpret to be anti-Mexican or anti-Muslim, or even anti-woman, you have to look far and wide to find any statement anywhere, written. paraphrased, or videotaped of Trump ever expressing any anti-Black feelings. A Google search will quickly identify every fake news purveyor on the internet. The point is, the originstors of fake news are sometimes not even in the media business. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 23:44, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
:::Mainstream media has for a solid 18 months reported the DNC [[talking point]] that Trump is anti-Black. While Trump has made statements and held policy positions some may misinterpret to be anti-Mexican or anti-Muslim, or even anti-woman, you have to look far and wide to find any statement anywhere, written. paraphrased, or videotaped of Trump ever expressing any anti-Black feelings. A Google search will quickly identify every fake news purveyor on the internet. The point is, the originstors of fake news are sometimes not even in the media business. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 23:44, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
::::JDano's definition amounts to ''a pejorative term aim at non-professional and alternative news reporting'' which stands on contrast to real news - the mainstream media. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 16:02, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
===Origins===
===Origins===
::As to the story attributed to the Kremlin about Hillary's colostomy, the ''Steele dossier'', which Sen. [[Chuck Grassley]] is investigating right now, alleging inappropriate and deviant sexual activity between Trump and a Moscow prostitute, can be seen as payback. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 19:12, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
::As to the story attributed to the Kremlin about Hillary's colostomy, the ''Steele dossier'', which Sen. [[Chuck Grassley]] is investigating right now, alleging inappropriate and deviant sexual activity between Trump and a Moscow prostitute, can be seen as payback. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 19:12, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
:::Hillary's colostomy is [http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2104.htm the only "Russian interference" that occured], and there is no evidence it was [[fake news]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 19:26, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
:::Hillary's colostomy is [http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2104.htm the only "Russian interference" that occured], and there is no evidence it was [[fake news]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]</sup> 19:26, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
==Propaganda vs. fake news==
==Propaganda vs. fake news==
It seems to me there is an important difference between propaganda and fake news. A government official may lie or mislead, and if those comments are reported accurately and attributed to the source, it is "news" and not "fake news." Fake news takes the form of fictional sources: "Mayor James Jones of Smithtown reported that ISIS militants shot up city hall." when there is no Smithtown and James Jones is not the Mayor and there was no ISIS attack. For this reason, the false narrative about Benghazi was '''not''' fake news. It was propaganda that was accurately reported in the media, and later the media accurately reported why it was a lie. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 05:36, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
It seems to me there is an important difference between propaganda and fake news. A government official may lie or mislead, and if those comments are reported accurately and attributed to the source, it is "news" and not "fake news." Fake news takes the form of fictional sources: "Mayor James Jones of Smithtown reported that ISIS militants shot up city hall." when there is no Smithtown and James Jones is not the Mayor and there was no ISIS attack. For this reason, the false narrative about Benghazi was '''not''' fake news. It was propaganda that was accurately reported in the media, and later the media accurately reported why it was a lie. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 05:36, 6 April 2017 (EDT)