Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 232:
Line 232: + +
Talk:Essay:Calming the Storm (view source)
Revision as of 20:39, April 6, 2017
, 20:39, April 6, 2017→An attempt at "peace": yes, but....
This essay is an essay, not a regular article. We already have [[Essay:Rebuttal to the "Calming the Storm" essay|a counter essay to this essay]]. Why don't we just keep it at that? Or, AugustO, I think I agree with you on this issue, but why not make your own counter essay? Is this not an acceptable solution? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:32, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
This essay is an essay, not a regular article. We already have [[Essay:Rebuttal to the "Calming the Storm" essay|a counter essay to this essay]]. Why don't we just keep it at that? Or, AugustO, I think I agree with you on this issue, but why not make your own counter essay? Is this not an acceptable solution? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:32, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
:That sounds sensible. But unfortunately, we have [[Best Conservapedia insights about the Bible]], where this is not longer treated as an essay, but as the source for a "Conservapedia insight". When Andrew Schlafly created this list of insights in March 2017, the discussion flamed up again. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 16:39, 6 April 2017 (EDT)