Changes

:I oppose removing any of the examples already listed, nor moving them to other sections of the article (thus implying they are not fake news). While you may consider fake news to only refer to social media stories, your definition seems to be in the minority. Most people use the definition I am supporting. If you haven't watched [http://video.foxnews.com/v/5364611516001/?#sp=show-clips this] already, I encourage you to do so. It's only 5 minutes. Your definition would take away any ability we would have to combat the leftist narrative of fake news (i.e. that the mainstream media does not promote false news stories). Including your definition is helpful, but fake news is clearly more than that.

:I oppose removing any of the examples already listed, nor moving them to other sections of the article (thus implying they are not fake news). While you may consider fake news to only refer to social media stories, your definition seems to be in the minority. Most people use the definition I am supporting. If you haven't watched [http://video.foxnews.com/v/5364611516001/?#sp=show-clips this] already, I encourage you to do so. It's only 5 minutes. Your definition would take away any ability we would have to combat the leftist narrative of fake news (i.e. that the mainstream media does not promote false news stories). Including your definition is helpful, but fake news is clearly more than that.

:I am not opposed to moving Trump's tweet to the "Conservative response" section, but this article now has info about the president all in one area, making it convenient for readers. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 7 April 2017 (EDT)

:I am not opposed to moving Trump's tweet to the "Conservative response" section, but this article now has info about the president all in one area, making it convenient for readers. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 7 April 2017 (EDT)

::Let me associate myself with the gentleman's comments above. And I would further add there is no way for Donald Trump or CNN to ever walk back his [https://youtu.be/1IDF-8khS3w calling CNN fske news at a press conference]. JDano's premise follows Hillary Clinton and the New York Times excuse for her loss. Fake news has been around for ever. According to polls, people under 35 hold [[Jon Stewart]] and the ''Daily Show'' in as high esteem as our parents held [[Walter Cronkite]] (only Stewart is funnier. btw, Did you know, CBS's Moscow bureau chief, [[Bernard Redmont]], whom Cronkite introduced nitely for while Americans were being killed at a rate of 100 per wk for ten eolid years fighting the spread of Soviet communism, was a KGB agent? If that is not 'fake news,' what is?) [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]} 13:11, 7 April 2017 (EDT)

::Let me associate myself with the gentleman's comments above. And I would further add there is no way for Donald Trump or CNN to ever walk back his [https://youtu.be/1IDF-8khS3w calling CNN fske news at a press conference]. JDano's premise follows Hillary Clinton and the New York Times excuse for her loss. Fake news has been around for ever. According to polls, people under 35 hold [[Jon Stewart]] and the ''Daily Show'' in as high esteem as our parents held [[Walter Cronkite]] (only Stewart is funnier. btw, Did you know, CBS's Moscow bureau chief, [[Bernard Redmont]], whom Cronkite introduced nitely while Americans were being killed at a rate of 100 per wk for ten eolid years fighting the spread of Soviet communism, was a KGB agent? If that is not 'fake news,' what is?) [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]} 13:11, 7 April 2017 (EDT)