Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 157:
Line 157: + + + + + +
→The translation should not change with each new development in physics
::''"Dissimilar contexts"''? Are you kidding me? The context only gets dissimilar ''artificially'' as ten times the construction is translated correctly, and one time falsely! Really, try to be a little bit more open-minded and get some second opinions on this! Talk to scholars! Please!!! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 16:14, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
::''"Dissimilar contexts"''? Are you kidding me? The context only gets dissimilar ''artificially'' as ten times the construction is translated correctly, and one time falsely! Really, try to be a little bit more open-minded and get some second opinions on this! Talk to scholars! Please!!! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 16:14, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
=== The translation should not change with each new development in physics ===
A physicist in the 19th century could have been fascinated by wave theory and could have explained the miracle thus: {{cquote|well, troubled sea, storm, that are just waves. Waves can be superimposed. Jesus could have yelled such a fantastically cleverly modulated and powerful wave that it extinguished the incoming waves of storm and sea. The Greek original may say εἶπεν, but basic physics demand the translation ''yelled''!}}This idea is not more far-fetched than your idea of an observed, then unobserved, then again observed storm (See: [[Talk:Essay:Calming the Storm#Invoking quantum mechanics is justwrong.]])
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 16:15, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
== Format ==
== Format ==