Changes

In setting up the premise for judicial supremacy, the justices committed precedential abuse by asserting that:

In setting up the premise for judicial supremacy, the justices committed precedential abuse by asserting that:

<blockquote>This decision declared the basic principle that the federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution, and that principle has ever since been respected by this Court and the Country as a permanent and indispensable feature of our constitutional system.</blockquote>

<blockquote>This decision declared the basic principle that the federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution, and that principle has ever since been respected by this Court and the Country as a permanent and indispensable feature of our constitutional system.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ejyJ21wIJe0C&pg=PA47 American Politicians Confront the Court: Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power]</ref></blockquote>

Unfortunately, '''Marbury v. Madison''' makes no such declaration anywhere in its text.<ref>[http://cf.heritage.org/initiatives/rule-of-law/judicial-activism/cases/cooper-v-aaron Judicial Activism, Cooper v. Aaron], [[Heritage Foundation]]</ref>

Unfortunately, '''Marbury v. Madison''' makes no such declaration anywhere in its text.<ref>[http://cf.heritage.org/initiatives/rule-of-law/judicial-activism/cases/cooper-v-aaron Judicial Activism, Cooper v. Aaron], [[Heritage Foundation]]</ref>