Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)

Revision as of 04:59, April 9, 2017

532 bytes added ,  04:59, April 9, 2017
→‎The CBP should be scrapped or at the very least have major changes: As to your four points above, you omit the need for an understanding of science, and you omit an acceptance of the conservative messages in the Bible. Liberals, no matte
Line 640: Line 640:     
The Bible did shape Western civilization/American conservatism and it is now having a positive impact on cultures which are experiencing a high growth of Christianity. On the other hand, the CBP should be scrapped. If it is not scrapped, at the very least it should be renamed the Conservapedia Bible Project. In addition, it should get rid of the idea of endeavoring to inject a list of predetermined words into the text and instead put a greater focus on determining the Biblical authors' original intent/meaning and translating this into contemporary language. In addition, a list of Bible translation resources should be compiled along with an action plan of study by the projects participants. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:15, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 
The Bible did shape Western civilization/American conservatism and it is now having a positive impact on cultures which are experiencing a high growth of Christianity. On the other hand, the CBP should be scrapped. If it is not scrapped, at the very least it should be renamed the Conservapedia Bible Project. In addition, it should get rid of the idea of endeavoring to inject a list of predetermined words into the text and instead put a greater focus on determining the Biblical authors' original intent/meaning and translating this into contemporary language. In addition, a list of Bible translation resources should be compiled along with an action plan of study by the projects participants. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:15, 8 April 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I responded at length at [[Talk:Calming the Storm]].  As to your four points above, you omit the need for an understanding of science, and you omit an acceptance of the [[conservative]] messages in the [[Bible]].  [[Liberals]], no matter how well-versed in the Greek/Hebrew, will inject bias and distortions into their translations.  In fact, the more knowledgeable they are about the Greek/Hebrew, the more clever the distortions may be.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:59, 9 April 2017 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,260

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1330395"

Navigation menu