SkipCaptcha
510
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 751:
Line 751: + + + + + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 23:42, April 10, 2017
, 23:42, April 10, 2017→Example of where the CBP elevates American culture over Ancient Near Eastern culture and obscures original intent of biblical authors
::Do you see anything wrong with this approach? As a book of logic, the Bible should be translated this way.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:40, 10 April 2017 (EDT)
::Do you see anything wrong with this approach? As a book of logic, the Bible should be translated this way.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:40, 10 April 2017 (EDT)
:::I once joked elsewhere about what would happen if Jesus ever tells you the adulteress story is true. I'll spare you the punchline, but suffice it to say you often come across as someone who's conservative first and Christian second.
:::I'm sure that's not true, of course, and I genuinely don't mean to impugn the depth of your faith. However - and especially if we're talking about logical analysis - it is beyond question that very few Christian conservatives are contributing to this site, and there must be a reason for this.
:::You doubtless have access to mailing lists from the Eagle Forum and probably other activist networks, too. Try sending out a pitch for Conservapedia and particularly the CBP, and see what kind of responses you get. I suspect most of the feedback will echo User:Conservative's concerns. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 19:42, 10 April 2017 (EDT)