Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,232
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 14:
Line 14: − ==External links== − *[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6P6bXA50c0&feature=related Neo-Darwinism's Homology Problem - Video Clip] Line 29:
Line 27: + + +
layout
By itself, this demolishes one part of the evolutionists’ argument and makes it, clearly, a case of arbitrary imposition of modern values. In a context such as the above, ‘radically different design’ would have indicated to an ancient reader either no deity, or else a deity whose means was chaos and instability, or a deity who did not have mastery over creation.<ref>Holding, 2006</ref>}}
By itself, this demolishes one part of the evolutionists’ argument and makes it, clearly, a case of arbitrary imposition of modern values. In a context such as the above, ‘radically different design’ would have indicated to an ancient reader either no deity, or else a deity whose means was chaos and instability, or a deity who did not have mastery over creation.<ref>Holding, 2006</ref>}}
== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
==External links==
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6P6bXA50c0&feature=related Neo-Darwinism's Homology Problem - Video Clip]
[[Category:Biology]]
[[Category:Biology]]
[[Category:Science]]
[[Category:Science]]