| Line 73: |
Line 73: |
| | |1983 | | |1983 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Heartwarming comedy about a kid who wants a BB Gun for Christmas. Selected for preservation in the National Film Registry in 2012. | + | |Heartwarming comedy about a kid who wants a BB Gun for Christmas. Selected for preservation in the National Film Registry in 2012. Stars child actor Peter Billingsley as main character Ralphie Parker and veteran actor Darren McGavin as his father Mr. Parker. |
| | |$19,294,144 | | |$19,294,144 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 97: |
Line 97: |
| | |1949 | | |1949 |
| | |Not rated | | |Not rated |
| − | | Spencer Tracy hilariously exposes budding [[feminism|feminist]] Katharine Hepburn's hypocritical double standards in the legal system. | + | |Spencer Tracy hilariously exposes budding [[feminism|feminist]] Katharine Hepburn's hypocritical double standards in the legal system. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 157: |
Line 157: |
| | |1986 | | |1986 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |Comedy film written by Harold Ramis (same screenwriter behind the conservative films ''Ghostbusters'' and ''Groundhog Day'') that exposes union corruption. | + | |Comedy film written by Harold Ramis (same screenwriter behind the conservative films ''Ghostbusters'' and ''Groundhog Day'') that exposes [[labor union]] corruption. |
| | |$15,945,534 | | |$15,945,534 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,257: |
Line 1,257: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Paul Blart is silly, but shows dedication in keeping the mall safe. Also Paul Blart wants to be a good father figure for his daughter, and ha some anti-feminism aspects as showing the father as the good parent against a mother (not present in the movie though, only seen in a photo), who only married him to get legal status in the country, and they left him. Which could also been seen as an anti-illegal immigrant message. This film is also somewhat anti-environmentalism. | + | |Mall security guard Paul Blart is silly, but shows dedication in keeping the mall he works at safe. Also, Paul wants to be a good father figure for his daughter, and the movie has some anti-feminism aspects as showing the father as the good parent against a mother (not present in the movie though, only seen in a photo), who only married him to get legal status in the country and then left him, which could also been seen as an anti-illegal immigrant message. This film is also somewhat anti-environmentalism. |
| | |$146,336,178 | | |$146,336,178 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,275: |
Line 1,275: |
| | |2015 | | |2015 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |Aliens take the earth in a war with a throwback to the classic video games. The film is pro-military, and pro-integrity, as a man who cheated in the video game action’s are shown in negative light. Promotes joy and having and shows the wastefulness of [[nihilism]]. Also, many anti-feminism themes are present. | + | |Aliens take the Earth in a war with a throwback to the classic video games. The film is pro-military, and pro-integrity, as the actions of a man who cheated in the video game are shown in negative light. Promotes joy and having and shows the wastefulness of [[nihilism]]. Also, many anti-[[feminism]] themes are present. |
| | |$78,747,585 <ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=pixels.htm</ref> | | |$78,747,585 <ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=pixels.htm</ref> |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,311: |
Line 1,311: |
| | |1984 | | |1984 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |A film by conservative writer and director [[John Milius]] about American high school students resisting a Soviet invasion through guerrilla warfare. Remade in 2012. | + | |A film by conservative writer and director [[John Milius]] about American high school students resisting a Soviet invasion through guerrilla warfare. Remade in 2012, this time with [[North Korea]]ns as the villains. |
| | |$35,866,000 | | |$35,866,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,335: |
Line 1,335: |
| | |1976 | | |1976 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |A talented but down-on-his-luck fighter gets a chance to challenge himself to the ends of his ability. This film-and its sequels and remakes- reinforces man's ability to overcome challenges. Included five sequels and one spin-off. | + | |A talented but down-on-his-luck fighter gets a chance to challenge himself to the ends of his ability. This film - and its sequels and remakes - reinforces man's ability to overcome challenges. Included five sequels and one spin-off. |
| | |$117,235,247 | | |$117,235,247 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,395: |
Line 1,395: |
| | |1984 | | |1984 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |A Polish film about two men, Max and Albert, played by Jerzy Stuhr and Olgierd Łukaszewicz, respectively, submit themselves in 1991 to the first human hibernation experiment. Instead of being awakened a few years later as planned, they wake up in the year 2044, in a post-nuclear world. By then, humans have retreated to underground living facilities, and, as a result of subjection to a specific kind of radiation, all males have died out. Women reproduce through parthenogenesis, living in an oppressive feminist society, where the apparatchiks teach that women suffered under males until males were removed from the world. The totalitarian female society was meant to represent Communism and [[feminism]] and the movie was meant to ridicule it. | + | |A Polish film about two men, Max and Albert, played by Jerzy Stuhr and Olgierd Łukaszewicz, respectively, submit themselves in 1991 to the first human hibernation experiment. Instead of being awakened a few years later as planned, they wake up in the year 2044, in a post-nuclear world. By then, humans have retreated to underground living facilities, and, as a result of subjection to a specific kind of radiation, all males have died out. Women reproduce through parthenogenesis, living in an oppressive feminist society, where the apparatchiks teach that women suffered under males until males were removed from the world. The totalitarian female society was meant to represent Communism and feminism and the movie was meant to ridicule it. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,425: |
Line 1,425: |
| | |2005 | | |2005 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | | Main lesson is that knowing how to use your abilities for your advantage, and that knowing how to use your strengths to achieve a goal. “Just because you have powers, that doesn't make you a hero.” Which can also be related to the expression "guns don't kill people, people kill people." Promotes the idea that anyone can be a hero. Shows the triumph of good vs evil. The main villain is a feminist, and her evil plan is to turn all the superheroes into babies, and raise them up to be evil, and loyal to her, (In a way she is playing God). In addition, the main female of the film is shown to contain many liberal beliefs (such as pacifism), but in the end, gives up her pacifism to fight back to help defeat the villains. | + | |Main lesson is that knowing how to use your abilities for your advantage, and that knowing how to use your strengths to achieve a goal. “Just because you have powers, that doesn't make you a hero.” Which can also be related to the expression "guns don't kill people, people kill people." Promotes the idea that anyone can be a hero. Shows the triumph of good vs evil. The main villain is a feminist, and her evil plan is to turn all the superheroes into babies, and raise them up to be evil, and loyal to her, (In a way she is playing God). In addition, the main female of the film is shown to contain many liberal beliefs (such as pacifism), but in the end, gives up her pacifism to fight back to help defeat the villains. |
| | |$63,946,815<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=skyhigh.htm</ref> | | |$63,946,815<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=skyhigh.htm</ref> |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,431: |
Line 1,431: |
| | |1959 | | |1959 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | | Paints evil in a very serious light in the form of Maleficent, and also showcases loyalty to family and duty in a positive light, as despite Aurora wanting to meet with the man she met in the woods, she ultimately honored her stepfamily in being returned to her birth family. Is also inherently anti-feminist in its messaging and for traditional marriage. It is also pro-family, as King Stefan and Queen Leah ultimately gave up their baby to protect her from the main villain, and the narration explicitly stated that the royal family and the kingdom awaited the day of her 16th birthday to allow her back into their family when the curse seemed to be averted. Unfortunately, it ended up being ruined in 2014 with a retelling starring the main villain and pushed the exact opposite messages in that film. | + | |Paints evil in a very serious light in the form of Maleficent, and also showcases loyalty to family and duty in a positive light, as despite Aurora wanting to meet with the man she met in the woods, she ultimately honored her stepfamily in being returned to her birth family. Is also inherently anti-feminist in its messaging and for traditional marriage. It is also pro-family, as King Stefan and Queen Leah ultimately gave up their baby to protect her from the main villain, and the narration explicitly stated that the royal family and the kingdom awaited the day of her 16th birthday to allow her back into their family when the curse seemed to be averted. Unfortunately, it ended up being ruined in 2014 with a revisionist retelling starring the main villain and pushed the exact opposite messages in that film. |
| | |$51.6 million | | |$51.6 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,463: |
Line 1,463: |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |The true story of champion surfer 13-year-old Bethany Hamilton who loses her arm to a shark. Her Christian faith helps her overcome her handicap to surf once again. | + | |The true story of champion surfer 13-year-old Bethany Hamilton, who loses her arm in a shark attack. Her Christian faith helps her overcome her handicap to surf once again. |
| | |$43,853,424 | | |$43,853,424 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,481: |
Line 1,481: |
| | |1971 | | |1971 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Liberal mathematician David Sumner moves to Cornwall, England with his wife to study stellar phenomena. While there, vicious criminals constantly harass him and his wife. The criminals do inhuman things such as kill his cat and rape his wife. Leaving Sumner's to abandon his liberal beliefs and pacifism and defend his life. | + | |Liberal mathematician David Sumner moves to Cornwall, England with his wife to study stellar phenomena. While there, vicious criminals constantly harass him and his wife. The criminals do inhuman things such as kill his cat and rape his wife, leaving Sumner to abandon his liberal beliefs and pacifism and defend his life and all he holds dear. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,493: |
Line 1,493: |
| | |2016 | | |2016 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |A team of super villains are given a second chance to fight for the greater good. Surprisingly the film glorifies some conservative values. The villain's a [[Pagan]] goddess named Enchantress ( a rare film where liberal Hollywood actually portrays a Pagan as evil instead of the tragic hero nonsense we've seen). Also, even throughout the film is about supervillains, many of them regret their life of crime, such as one of the characters Deadshot abandons his opportunity to kill Batman on his daughter's behalf and another character El Diablo who used his superpower for evil ends up accidentally killing his family, which has haunted him. Moreover, in a dream sequence villain Harley Quinn shows her deepest desires which is being a housewife (points for having the guts for showing a female character not want to be part of the feminist agenda, especially in this day and age, even if it not surprisingly infuriated liberal critics<ref>http://www.avclub.com/article/margot-robbie-deserves-better-suicide-squads-sexis-240618</ref>). More interesting enough the director David Ayer is a Christian<ref>http://www.interviewmagazine.com/film/shia-labeouf/#page2</ref> who was once in the Navy.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/oct/16/david-ayer-something-maternal-about-tank-in-fury-brad-pitt</ref> So it's not surprising he added these values onto his film. | + | |A team of super villains are given a second chance to fight for the greater good. Surprisingly the film glorifies some conservative values. The villain's a [[Pagan]] goddess named Enchantress ( a rare film where liberal Hollywood actually portrays a Pagan as evil instead of the tragic hero nonsense we've seen). Also, even throughout the film is about supervillains, many of them regret their life of crime, such as one of the characters Deadshot abandons his opportunity to kill Batman on his daughter's behalf and another character El Diablo who used his superpower for evil ends up accidentally killing his family, which has haunted him. Moreover, in a dream sequence villain Harley Quinn shows her deepest desires which is being a housewife (points for having the guts for showing a female character not wanting to be part of the feminist agenda, especially in this day and age, even if it not surprisingly infuriated liberal critics<ref>http://www.avclub.com/article/margot-robbie-deserves-better-suicide-squads-sexis-240618</ref>). More interesting enough the director David Ayer is a Christian<ref>http://www.interviewmagazine.com/film/shia-labeouf/#page2</ref> who was once in the Navy.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/oct/16/david-ayer-something-maternal-about-tank-in-fury-brad-pitt</ref> So it's not surprising he added these values onto his film. |
| | |$325,100,054 | | |$325,100,054 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,523: |
Line 1,523: |
| | |2010 | | |2010 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |In its own strange way, ''Tangled'' stands as a perfect allegory for the Gospel of Christ. Rapunzel represents humanity, who has grown comfortable in her prison but can’t ignore the light that shines in the darkness. The devil is signified by Mother Gothel, who tries to convince Rapunzel to forget the outside world and stay locked away in her tower. Lastly, God can be found in Rapunzel's real parents, who without fail, continue to shine their light in the hopes of bringing their lost child back home. | + | |In its own strange way, ''Tangled'' stands as a perfect allegory for the Gospel of Christ. Teenage heroine Rapunzel represents humanity, who has grown comfortable in her prison but can’t ignore the light that shines in the darkness. [[Satan|The devil]] is signified by Mother Gothel, who tries to convince Rapunzel to forget the outside world and stay locked away in her tower. Lastly, [[God]] can be found in Rapunzel's real parents, who without fail, continue to shine their light in the hopes of bringing their lost child back home. A TV series sequel to this movie, ''Tangled: The Series'', debuted in 2017. |
| | |$591,794,936 | | |$591,794,936 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,529: |
Line 1,529: |
| | |1956 | | |1956 |
| | |UR | | |UR |
| − | |The definitive film portrayal of [[Exodus]]. | + | |The definitive film portrayal of [[Exodus]]. Stars Charlton Heston as main character Moses and as the voice of God (the latter role shared with Delos Jewkes), John Carradine as Moses' brother [[Aaron]], Yul Brynner as Egyptian pharaoh and main antagonist [[Ramses II]], Edward G. Robinson as corrupt Hebrew overseer and secondary antagonist Dathan, Yvonne De Carlo as Moses' wife [[Zipporah|Sephora]], Anne Baxter as Moses' original love interest (and later Ramses II's wife) Nefretiri, Nina Foch as Moses' foster mother Bithia, John Derek as Hebrew stonecutter and Moses' right-hand man [[Joshua]], Debra Paget as Joshua's love interest Lilia, Sir Cedric Hardwicke as Pharaoh Sethi, Judith Anderson as Bithia's servant Memnet, Vincent Price as Sethi's architect Baka, Martha Scott as Moses' biological mother [[Jochebed|Yochebel]] and Olive Deering as Moses' sister [[Miriam]]. |
| | |$65,500,000 | | |$65,500,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,583: |
Line 1,583: |
| | |2015 | | |2015 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |War veteran and minister Jesse Dean stands up against [[Planned Parenthood]] when an abortion clinic moves across his Church. | + | |War veteran and minister Jesse Dean stands up against [[Planned Parenthood]] when an abortion clinic moves across the street from his Church. |
| | |$418,940 | | |$418,940 |
| | |- | | |- |