SkipCaptcha
1,101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: +
→Goliath
UPDATE: I also want to completely remove the part under 'David and Jonathan' that describes the liberal claims on what the Bible supposedly says 'sexually' was going on between David and Jonathan. It's obviously nonsense and I don't want anyone to even come across such discussion on a page devoted to David himself (although that might have a place on [[David and Jonathan]]). I have not removed it yet because I at least want give other editors an opportunity to disagree with me. --Unsigned comment by Korvex
UPDATE: I also want to completely remove the part under 'David and Jonathan' that describes the liberal claims on what the Bible supposedly says 'sexually' was going on between David and Jonathan. It's obviously nonsense and I don't want anyone to even come across such discussion on a page devoted to David himself (although that might have a place on [[David and Jonathan]]). I have not removed it yet because I at least want give other editors an opportunity to disagree with me. --Unsigned comment by Korvex
:[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=King_David&curid=1715&diff=1333583&oldid=1333539 This is the edit], for future reference. I personally don't have any objections, but the fact that theological liberals are increasingly distorting more and more passages of te Bible to support their views. The sexual content may seem silly to mention, but it, like many other "disputed" portions of the Bible may be necessary to refute due to this reason. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:34, 20 April 2017 (EDT)
:[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=King_David&curid=1715&diff=1333583&oldid=1333539 This is the edit], for future reference. I personally don't have any objections, but the fact that theological liberals are increasingly distorting more and more passages of te Bible to support their views. The sexual content may seem silly to mention, but it, like many other "disputed" portions of the Bible may be necessary to refute due to this reason. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:34, 20 April 2017 (EDT)
I almost feel as if anyone who thinks David and Jonathan had any intimate relationship in the first place are far out of reach to convince anyways. I would consider it, but it would almost seem like polluting the page by devoting a section to something that a liberal wouldn't understand in the first place. I do think however the part on Jonathan needs to be expanded a little.