447
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + +
no edit summary
I'd like to also note that you can't make the facts go away by calling the "opinions," reverting, locking & blocking. You can just make the facts go away from ''you''. To think of an educator employing such draconian tactics to hide ''science'' from his students!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:38, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
I'd like to also note that you can't make the facts go away by calling the "opinions," reverting, locking & blocking. You can just make the facts go away from ''you''. To think of an educator employing such draconian tactics to hide ''science'' from his students!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:38, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
I have to agree, if AiG is considered an acceptable source on this site, then the National Geographic has to be considered reliable as well: it's one of the most distinguished and respected scientific journals in the world.
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]