635
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 221:
Line 221: +
→Dictionary definitions
:I don't see how dictionary definitions, based upon a neologism that came from ''Screw'' magazine, have any authenticity in an encylopedic entry. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:47, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
:I don't see how dictionary definitions, based upon a neologism that came from ''Screw'' magazine, have any authenticity in an encylopedic entry. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:47, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
::I'm not I'm understanding your point [[User:RobS|RobS]]. The [http://www.narth.com/docs/creates.html| cite] provided the history of the neologism...Is it your objection that the term was not first coined by an reputable source? What is being given more weight: the '''history''' of the neologism ''or'' the '''source''' of the history? --[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 14:09, 28 April 2007 (EDT)