1,066
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + +
Talk:National Rifle Association (view source)
Revision as of 18:11, April 28, 2007
, 18:11, April 28, 2007→Constitutional right or human right?: oh please
Sorry if I seem confrontational, but I'm tired and feel strongly on this subject. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
Sorry if I seem confrontational, but I'm tired and feel strongly on this subject. --<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Wik</font><font color="#444444" face="Times New Roman">i</font><font color="#666666" face="Times New Roman">nterpreter</font>'''<sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
: This is ridiculous. Whether or not the UN has problems with anti-semitism has nothing to do with whether their enumeration of human rights is important. However, as far as I'm aware, even the NRA itself doesn't attempt to claim that the right bear arms is a fundamental human right. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 14:11, 28 April 2007 (EDT)