Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − +
→Arab Spring: pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist?
==Arab Spring: pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist?==
==Arab Spring: pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist?==
[[Neocon]] fundamentally is a codeword for [[Zionist]]. The Arab Spring was either pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist. It either served the neocon agenda or opposed it. While it aligned itself with the neocon theories of democratitization, it elected the anti-democratic [[Muslim Brotherhood]] in the the most populous state. Hence, I would surmmize we should stop referring to the Arab Spring as part of the neocon agenda. Globalist? Yes. Soros backed? Yes. Neocon? No. The neocons and Zionists have no bigger enemy than [[George Soros]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]</sup> 15:06, 29 April 2017 (EDT)
[[Neocon]] fundamentally is a codeword for [[Zionist]]. The Arab Spring was either pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist. It either served the neocon agenda or opposed it. While it aligned itself with the neocon theories of democratitization, it elected the anti-democratic [[Muslim Brotherhood]] in the most populous Middle Eastern Arab Muslim state of Egypt. Hence, I would surmmize we should stop referring to the Arab Spring as part of the neocon agenda. Globalist? Yes. Soros backed? Yes. Neocon? No. The neocons and Zionists have no bigger enemy than [[George Soros]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]</sup> 15:06, 29 April 2017 (EDT)